Carjacking suspect's Batman story doesn't fly
Holy carjacking, Batman!
A man wanted by Pittsburgh police for assault tried to carjack a vehicle parked in Shadyside about 7:15 p.m. Saturday, city police said.
At the wheel• A plain-clothed Pittsburgh detective.
After being taken into custody, the man, identified as Micah Calamosca, 21, told police that he was taking the vehicle as part of the script for the latest Batman movie, said police Sgt. Brian Elledge.
Filming for portions of "The Dark Knight Rises" began Friday in Pittsburgh and is expected to continue for several weeks.
Police said they had been looking for Calamosca in connection with an alleged assault, details of which were not immediately available. Elledge said Det. Robert DiGiacomo was sitting in an unmarked car at Ivy and Walnut Street when Calamosca got in and told the officer to get out of the car. Calamosca matched the description of the assault suspect, police said.
DiGiacomo drew a weapon on Calamosca and a scuffle ensued. DiGiacomo ultimately got the suspect to the ground with the help of an off-duty police officer from Virginia Beach, Va., who was providing security for the film crew.
Calamosca was charged with robbery of a motor vehicle, a felony. As of this afternoon, he had not posted $5,000 bail, according to court documents.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.