Fire-eater torches previous world record at renaissance festival
Dan Hasselius literally torched a Guinness World Record for fire eating while performing for a crowd Sunday at the Pittsburgh Renaissance Festival in West Newton, Westmoreland County.
Extinguishing 41 torches in 30 seconds, Hasselius, who appears as Wilsome in his show "Great Balls of Fire," exceeded the standing record by two torches.
"It feels awesome. It feels really great," said Hasselius afterwards. "After 17 years in fire eating and eating a lot of torches I'm very used to having fire in my mouth."
According to the Guinness World Records official website, the current record for most torches extinguished in 30 seconds with the mouth -- 39 -- was achieved by Hubertus Wawra of Germany in Mumbai, India on Feb. 21.
Documentation is being submitted to Guinness World Records Limited in London for authentication.
It took two attempts for Hasselius to achieve his goal.
On his first try he succeeded in extinguishing only 31 torches.
Before starting Hasselius had some concern about the wind that was gusting between 14 and 20 miles an hour.
He was less concerned about possible physical dangers.
"I have been on fire many times," he told those invited to serve as witnesses and timers. "Don't panic. Just focus on your particular aspect. It will just make it more exciting."
Moments after the time trial ended, Hasselius was already looking toward his next goal: "I'd like to go for the 60-second world record," he said.
That record stands at 89 torches and was achieved by Pascal Ackermann of Switzerland in Rome, Italy, on April 1, 2010.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.