Jury set to hear state House corruption case
HARRISBURG — The criminal charges against three former House Republicans have a single theme: "the use of taxpayers' money for campaigns," a prosecutor said today.
"It's about powerful people using taxpayers' money to make their campaigns more effective," Chief Deputy Attorney General Frank Fina told a Dauphin County jury. The goal of those accused was to keep power and increase power, Fina said. The testimony, he said, will show "millions of dollars of theft and conflict of interest."
A jury of six men and six women will decide the fate of former House GOP Whip Brett Feese of Lycoming County, his aide Jill Seaman and Brian Preski, former chief of staff to ex-House Speaker John Perzel, a Philadelphia Republican. Feese also served as chief counsel for the House Republican Caucus.
They are accused of participating in a scheme to spend state money on technology to help Republicans win elections. Dauphin County Judge Richard Lewis is presiding over the case. It's a crime to use equipment purchased by the state for campaigns, Fina said. The reason it's a crime, Fina said: "How do you even have a chance (to run for office) against somebody who has taxpayers' money on their side?"
Dubbed "Computergate" by the court, it is the latest case in nearly a five-year investigation by the attorney's general's office into the use of public resources for campaigns.
The man who presided over the House Republican Caucus was Perzel, and Preski was "his right hand man," Fina said. Perzel, 61, may testify as a Commonwealth wittness -- among more than 50 -- against his former employees and colleagues. Perzel pleaded guilty to eight felonies last month.
Preski, as Perzel's chief of staff, was more powerful than rank-and-file legislators, Fina said.
Three people with ties to the House Democratic Caucus were convicted last year of using public resources for campaigns. Seven Democrats pleaded guilty and two were acquitted. Three other Democrats, including ex-Speaker Bill DeWeese of Greene County, await trial.
Six Republicans charged in the technology case – including Perzel – have entered guilty pleas, and their plea agreements with the attorney general's office compel their cooperation with prosecutors, potentially as trial witnesses.
Former attorney general and now-Gov. Tom Corbett, a Republican, launched the investigation in response to news reports in January 2007 about bonuses paid to House Democratic staffers.
The trial may last about two months. Defense attorneys for Preski, Feese and Seman are expected to make their opening arguments later today with testimony likely tomorrow.
Prosecutors say they streamlined the charges for trial.
Preski, 47, now faces 54 counts of theft, conflict of interest and conspiracy. He had been charged with 72 offenses.
Feese, 57, a lawyer from Muncy, and Seaman, 59, of Dauphin, are both charged with 40 counts of theft, conflict of interest and conspiracy, including one count each of hindering apprehension and obstruction.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.