ShareThis Page

Judge reinstates plea deal after jailing man for negative comment

| Monday, Oct. 31, 2011

An Allegheny County judge accepted a Clairton man's plea deal today in a criminal case, five days after she jailed him and voided it when he made a disparaging remark in court.

Edward Burgwin, 45, again pleaded no contest to endangering the welfare of a child and simple assault in exchange for six months of house arrest and five years of probation for a Sept. 1, 2010, incident with a girl. Burgwin took the same deal on Wednesday, but while sitting in the gallery after the plea, he made a remark about the process, which was relayed to Common Pleas Judge Donna Jo McDaniel by a staffer.

She voided the plea and revoked his bond while the man's attorney, James Sheets, was not present.

During a hearing today, the judge agreed to accept the plea deal again, saying she took his comments last week to mean he wanted to withdraw his plea. The judge said she decided to void the plea deal last week without Sheets present after her staff unsuccessfully tried to contact him.

Burgwin told the judge today that he understood the deal and agreed to it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.