Pitt coach: Gonzalez back at quarterback spot
Pitt coach Paul Chryst said today that Anthony Gonzalez will return to quarterback this spring after playing H-back last season under the previous coaching staff.
Gonzalez will be one of five quarterbacks on the spring roster, including incumbent Tino Sunseri, who will be a senior after making 26 starts the past two seasons.
Chryst said there will be competition at all positions, but he added, "You have guys who are really well established and they shouldn't get beat out."
Gonzalez, who will be a redshirt sophomore next season, was recruited as a quarterback in 2010 after leading Bethlehem Liberty to a PIAA Class AAAA championship in 2008.
He was moved to H-back where he caught nine passes for 58 yards as a backup. Gonzalez, 6-foot-3, 215 pounds, also played quarterback in the Wildcat formation, carrying eight times for 36 yards and a touchdown.
Chryst said he is "kind of curious" to see Gonzalez at quarterback. "But it will be hard (to get all the quarterbacks enough work in the spring). It's going to have to sort itself out a little bit. You just don't have that many reps."
Montour High School graduate E.J. Banks, who will be a junior, is moving from defensive back to quarterback — at least on a temporary basis. The other quarterbacks are freshman Trey Anderson and redshirt freshman Mark Myers.
Incoming freshman quarterback Chad Voytik won't arrive on campus until after he graduates this spring from Cleveland (Tenn.) High School.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.