Shoplifter gives brush-off to mayoral candidate Robinson
Pittsburgh mayoral candidate Carmen Robinson was campaigning outside a Bloomfield grocery store Tuesday when a 260-pound woman carrying ice cream, ranch dressing and razor blades rushed by.
"I tried to hand her some literature and she keeps going, and it was the first time that anyone has done that to me," said Robinson, 40, of the Hill District. Even if they're fans of Mayor Luke Ravenstahl or his other challenger, Councilman Patrick Dowd, "they still give me a chance to hear what I have to say."
Robinson, a former police sergeant, soon learned why the woman had no interest in chatting when Robinson briefly followed and tried to stop her.
Two employees of the ShurSave grocery store emerged about 2:05 p.m. to inform Robinson that she just had a brush with a shoplifter.
Robinson said she was "quite embarrassed" by the incident.
The woman fled in a car with $18.46 worth of groceries, said police spokeswoman Diane Richard.
"She apparently took some items up to the cash register and didn't have enough money to pay for them. She put them into a bag and left the store," Richard said.
The police report does not mention Robinson's involvement, Richard said.
Police described the shoplifter as black, in her 30s, and weighing about 260 pounds. She had a ponytail. A description of the car was not available.
Robinson is running against Ravenstahl and Dowd in the May 19 Democratic primary.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.