ShareThis Page

GOP turnout key in Pennsylvania governor's race, experts say

| Sunday, Oct. 3, 2010

HARRISBURG — A final month of TV advertising and successfully getting voters to the polls Nov. 2 are among the keys to becoming Pennsylvania's next governor, experts say.

The race between Democrat Dan Onorato and Republican Tom Corbett remains in play, although national and state trends favor the GOP candidate, said Steve Peterson, a political science professor at Penn State University's Harrisburg campus.

"I am not normally of the view that a TV ad can be a game changer," Peterson said. But Rep. Joe Sestak's "jaw-dropping" primary campaign ad showing incumbent Sen. Arlen Specter talking about changing political parties to win re-election helped Sestak win the Democratic nomination for Senate. That indicates Onorato could make up ground or Corbett could put the race away with an ad.

Polls in late September showed Corbett with an average lead of 8.4 percentage points, according to . A poll by Susquehanna Polling and Research for the Tribune-Review last week showed Corbett leading by 6 percentage points. A Susquehanna poll in June had Corbett up by 10, said Jim Lee, the company president.

Some undecided Democrats moved to support Onorato when they became familiar with him through TV ads, Lee said.

"At the end of the day, Republicans don't carry this state by big margins," Lee said. "It sounds cliche, but it really does come down to (Election Day) turnout."

With the election four weeks from Tuesday, both campaigns will concentrate on identifying core supporters. To encourage voters, they'll consult lists provided by interest groups such as businesses and organized labor, and follow through with mail, e-mails and phone calls.

Democrats hold a voter registration edge of 1.2 million over Republicans in Pennsylvania, where voters have backed Democratic presidential candidates since 1992. But there's no question data suggest Republicans are more likely to vote this November, Lee said.

"Obviously, we need to mobilize our supporters throughout the state and get them out Election Day," said Brian Herman, a spokesman for Onorato.

With two Western Pennsylvania candidates — Onorato from Brighton Heights and Corbett from Shaler — there's a lack of enthusiasm in Philadelphia, the state's largest Democratic voting bloc, said Larry Ceisler, a former Democratic consultant and partner of Ceisler Jubelirer, a public relations firm in Philadelphia.

"I think it's Corbett's election to lose," Ceisler said.

"Onorato has been playing catch-up, and Corbett has set the tone of the election," said David Chambers, a political science professor at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Both camps say independent voters, who make up about 10 percent of the electorate, could swing the election in a close race.

Dissatisfaction with Washington primarily is driving anticipated GOP turnout, said Wesley McDonald, a political science professor at Elizabethtown College in Lancaster County. Many people are intent on delivering a message to Congress and the Obama administration about the $814 billion stimulus legislation, the national debt and high taxes. As a Democrat, Onorato suffers from "guilt by association," McDonald said.

And there is "anger and despair" about the job climate, he said.

But angst over jobs is what Onorato hopes to seize upon; his campaign made creating and protecting jobs its cornerstone.

It's also the year of Tea Party voters.

"The Tea Party is an important part of the electorate," said Kevin Harley, a Corbett spokesman. "They're very energized."

Corbett's message of less government will "resonate not only with Tea Party members but Republicans, independents and Democrats," Harley said.

The candidates debated in Hershey last week before the state Chamber of Business and Industry and are scheduled to debate two more times, including Oct. 16 in Pittsburgh. Onorato says he is the candidate with the resume and experience to create jobs. Corbett says he'll slash bloated state spending and won't raise taxes.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.