ShareThis Page

UPMC announces $618 million profit, fends off critics

| Friday, Aug. 24, 2007

The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center posted a record annual profit of $618 million, the health care giant announced Thursday.

"Being a nonprofit under the IRS code does not mean such an entity makes no profit," said UPMC spokeswoman Wendy Zellner. "In fact, nonprofits must make an excess margin (profit) to reinvest in their core missions and to maintain their vitality."

Chief Financial Officer Robert DeMichiei said the profits will be reinvested to strengthen the region's largest health care provider, enhance clinical programs and increase academic support for the University of Pittsburgh.

Some questioned the size of the profit, which covered the fiscal year that ended June 30.

"The question is, what do they do with all the money?" said Robert Strauss, professor of economics and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University.

Allegheny County Prothonotary Michael Lamb, the Democratic nominee for city controller, wondered whether UPMC pays its fair share for city services, a recurring theme among critics.

"They do have the state law regarding nonprofits on their side, but given the fiscal situation of the city, we want to ensure everyone pays their fair share. The question is, what is their fair share?" Lamb said.

UPMC's profit for fiscal 2007 compared with a profit of $525 million for the previous 12-month period that ended June 30, 2006. The hospital system reported record revenues that jumped 13 percent to $6.8 billion, compared with $6 billion a year earlier.

The majority of UPMC's profit in fiscal 2007 came from investment returns of $403 million, compared with $206 million the year before.

"Our diversified portfolio mirrored the stock market in producing stellar gains for the year," DeMichiei said. "However, we don't count on such gains every year, given the volatility of the stock market."

Profit from patient services and insurance operations for the year was $220 million, down $101 million from an operating profit of $321 million a year earlier.

Medical-surgical admissions for the fiscal year rose 2.6 percent, while outpatient activity increased 11 percent. Membership in UPMC's health insurance companies increased to 1.2 million in fiscal 2007, up more than 276,000 members. The increase was attributed primarily to a large Medicaid behavioral health contract, strong Medicare growth and implementation of a new disability insurance product.

UPMC said operating profits were lower because it added 2,000 employees, including 170 physicians, and spent $105 million on new and expanded electronic health record technology. UPMC also spent $185 million on construction of the new Children's Hospital in Lawrenceville.

Employment totals more than 45,000 worldwide.

"There is nothing in the law that prohibits a nonprofit corporation from making money," Zellner said. "Unlike for-profit entities, we have no stockholders, and excess revenues must be used to reinvest in our facilities and programs or to otherwise provide a community benefit."

UPMC's profit as a percentage of revenues for the fiscal year was 9.1 percent, higher than the same ratio at U.S. Steel Corp., 8.9 percent; H.J. Heinz Co., 8.7 percent; Alcoa Inc., 7.2 percent; and PPG Industries Inc., 6.5 percent.

The four companies in their most recent fiscal years paid income taxes of $324 million, $332.8 million, $835 million and $278 million, respectively. UPMC's income tax paid was $5 million.

Whether a nonprofit organization is fulfilling its core mission to better the communities where it does business is taken on faith, said professor Mark V. Pauly, professor of Health Care Systems and Economics at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

"The real issue is whether or not the new things UPMC is spending money on are more important than if it instead lowered its prices," he said.

Pauly added that pediatric hospitals nationwide are undergoing a "growth spurt" and that the new Children's won't hold down costs.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.