Oakmont officials hope Hulton bridge replacement will open in 2012
By Michael Aubele
Published: Sunday, May 20, 2007
PennDOT has announced it plans to replace the Hulton Bridge with a span that could open late in 2012.
Preliminary design work on the new bridge should start this summer. The complete design process could take up to five years to complete.
"This is a very exciting project," said Oakmont Manager Roger Dunlap.
Borough officials have been pushing for a wider, safer bridge connecting their community with Harmar.
The new bridge, Dunlap said, should be designed to reflect the "nature and character of Oakmont," a quaint town of about 7,000 people on the Allegheny River.
PennDOT, last month, awarded a design contract to Harrisburg-based Gannett Fleming Inc., chosen from among 11 firms that submitted proposals for the engineering work.
PennDOT has not released the cost of the contract. As of last October, PennDOT and the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission said they had budgeted $2.5 million for engineering over the next two years.
Replacement cost of the bridge ranges from $50 million to $80 million, said Jim Struzzi, PennDOT spokesman. Construction, he said, should begin in 2011 and take two construction seasons to complete.
"We are hoping for late in 2012, but (it) will be determined during the design phase and dependent on available funding," Struzzi said.
The money to build the bridge will be a mix of state and federal funds. About 80 percent of the funding will be federal highway dollars.
Local leaders and state Rep. Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont, have been among those pushing for PennDOT to replace the bridge, Struzzi said.
There are three options for maintaining traffic flow during construction. They are:
- Replacing the bridge along its existing line while traffic is detoured.
- Building the new span upstream from the existing one and having traffic cross Hulton Bridge during construction.
- Building the new span, in stages, upstream. Traffic would be maintained on the existing bridge until enough new construction allows for traffic to cross the replacement bridge.
Struzzi said there will be road improvements on either side of the new bridge to accommodate the construction. He couldn't confirm that the current, two-lane bridge would be replaced by a four-lane structure.
"Although the existing bridge is safe, it is in need of extensive repair. It would take more money to complete the necessary rehabilitation than to replace it with a new structure," said Struzzi.
About 24,000 vehicles cross Hulton Bridge each day.
Harmar Police Capt. Rick Toney, said he watches traffic backups near the bridge almost daily. One of the biggest problems, he said, is that the bridge is too narrow for tractor-trailer trucks to turn onto it easily and safely.
"For them to build a wider bridge," he said, "it would make a significant difference."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.