Sen. Jane Orie seeks expanded jury pool for October retrial
State Sen. Jane Orie wants her constituents included in the jury pool for her second trial, which an Allegheny County judge yesterday delayed until October.
In a request filed with Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey A. Manning, the McCandless Republican asked that the jury pool include everyone from Allegheny County. Manning barred anyone living within Orie's 40th Senatorial District from serving on the jury in her first corruption trial, which ended in a mistrial last month when the judge concluded that Orie's attorney submitted forged documents as evidence.
Orie, 49, appealed her case yesterday to the state Supreme Court, seeking to have the charges against her thrown out on double jeopardy grounds. She also asked the court to have Manning removed as trial judge.
Orie is accused of using her state-paid staff to do campaign work for her and her sister, Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin. Another sister, Janine Orie, 56, of McCandless — an aide to Melvin — also is charged. Melvin, 54, of Marshall is not charged but is under investigation.
Orie wants Manning to sequester the next jury from the time it is picked until the case ends. Manning sequestered the jury only during deliberations in the first trial.
University of Pittsburgh law professor John Burkoff said it's unlikely that Manning would change his mind on excluding Orie's constituents from serving on the jury.
"She has to be able to convince the judge that he was wrong or prove that it wasn't necessary (in the first trial)," Burkoff said. "With (the jury sequestration), that one has a reasonable chance. There was so much continuing news coverage during the first trial that Judge Manning might be nervous about what the jurors might hear."
After a brief conference with attorneys in the case, Manning delayed jury selection until Oct. 3, citing ongoing appeals and the investigation into the forged documents. Selection was set to begin next week.
Secret Service experts are examining the paper and ink on the forged documents, which Orie's defense used to attempt to discredit the prosecution's key witness, her former chief of staff, Jamie Pavlot.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Starkey: Would one big move kill Pirates’ future?
- Steelers offensive linemen looking to build on strong 2013 finish
- 2 sentenced for avoiding arrest after Steelers player was stabbed
- Pirates inquire about Red Sox LHP Lester
- 6 cited for trespassing on UPMC property at union rally
- Coal, union rallies dot Pittsburgh landscape this week
- Former walk-ons may lose scholarships under Penn State’s Franklin
- Detour on Bower Hill Road to end Friday
- 5 Seconds of Summer announce 2015 tour
- Pirates think Mercer’s defense deserves more credit
- Rivers Casino sued by family of patron who died in car crash