Outgoing gaming chairman named to board
Outgoing state Gaming Control Board Chairman Greg Fajt became incoming Gaming Control Board member Greg Fajt when Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa appointed him to a four-year term on Friday.
Gov. Tom Corbett appointed Fajt's replacement as chairman -- William H. Ryan -- a week ago. Ryan starts his term on Monday. Fajt's experience as chairman made him a logical choice for the board, Costa said.
Democratic and Republican leaders in the House and Senate each appoint one member to the board, and the governor appoints three.
"There is no question that Greg Fajt has a great understanding of gaming issues, and his expertise has been an asset to the commonwealth over the years," said Costa, D-Forest Hills. "In addition to his vast knowledge of the industry, Greg has an outstanding reputation. His honesty and sound judgment were key factors in my decision."
Fajt, of Mt. Lebanon, has served as the board's chairman since 2009, when then-Gov. Ed Rendell appointed him. Before that, he was Rendell's chief of staff.
Ryan was Corbett's top deputy in the attorney general's office and became acting attorney general when Corbett became governor this year. During Ryan's time running the attorney general's office, investigators issued a grand jury report that tore into the gaming control board, alleging it protected politically connected casino applicants and put casinos' interests over taxpayers'.
Fajt defended his agency against the report, which covered a period of time before he joined the board. Fajt's tenure as chairman included the introduction of table games.
"I will continue to work with my fellow board members to ensure that the oversight of Pennsylvania's gaming industry is one which other states can emulate," Fajt said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.