Luzerne judge recommends tossing convictions
In an unprecedented decision, a court-appointed master on Wednesday recommended the wholesale reversal of thousands of convictions of juveniles who appeared before a corrupt Luzerne County judge.
In a 32-page report, Arthur E. Grim, the special master appointed by the state Supreme Court, said evidence that the youths were deprived of their constitutional rights was so expansive and persuasive that all the cases heard over five years should be thrown out and not be retried.
The cases involve youths who appeared between 2003 and May 2008 before former judge Mark A. Civarella Jr., who is awaiting sentencing for a guilty plea to federal corruption charges.
Ciavarella and former Luzerne County judge Michael T. Conahan pleaded guilty to charges they were paid nearly $3 million in kickbacks from the operators of private juvenile detention facilities.
Dan Segal, an attorney representing the youths and their families in a pending federal civil suit, said Grim's recommendation was remarkable. He said he's hopeful the Supreme Court will adopt it.
"What he is saying is that the miscarriage of justice was so great and so persuasive that all these cases should be thrown out," Segal said. "It is without precedent."
Grim said his review of individual transcripts in a sample of cases showed Ciavarella repeatedly failed to inform the youths they had a right to legal representation.
"There was not a single word in any of the 12 transcripts concerning the juveniles' right to counsel," Grim wrote.
For those who had lawyers, Grim said those who served their sentences should have their findings of delinquency vacated as well. He said no good would come from retrying those cases.
Segal said, under the recommendation, a small percentage of cases Ciavarella heard would be reviewed. Those include youths who had lawyers and who are in custody or on probation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- NHTSA investigates 500K Ford cars for steering issues
- Pirates notebook: Bucs to target pitching on trade market
- Effort to redevelop Connellsville gets financial boost
- Seinfeld takes Irwin man’s Jaguar for a sip, spin
- County executive, 2nd councilman included in ethics probe over Deer Lakes Park drilling vote
- Fayette parents sue hospitals, blood bank, doctor over infant son’s death
- ‘Connellsville Day’ planned at PNC Park
- Woman in Route 28 crash has outstanding warrants
- All-star Watson blows late lead as Reds rally past Pirates
- Owner makes strides in sprucing up neglected Lower Burrell mobile home park
- Mt. Pleasant’s plans for Penn Park move forward