Pennsylvania's court system faces severe cash crunch
HARRISBURG — The state budget crisis may soon force the court system to make dramatic changes.
The courts won't stop trying criminal defendants or prevent litigants from filing new lawsuits. But a letter sent late last month from Chief Justice Ronald Castille to Gov. Ed Rendell said the judiciary was in a "precarious financial position" and asked Rendell to stop nominating judges for vacancies as a cost-saving measure.
Keeping about two dozen judgeships open until next year's elections could save a few million dollars a year, but that will be only a small step toward coping with state funding expected to be far less than what the courts believe they need to maintain operations.
Among the court systems' other options are cutting positions, slowing the handling of cases or even shutting down some operations one day each week.
The Legislature and governor determine how much the judiciary gets. That's $305 million a year, and the Rendell administration has proposed maintaining that level for the fiscal year starting July 1.
A flat funding level "is much better than other programs and agencies are doing in this environment," Rendell press secretary Gary Tuma said. "Everybody's taking a hit, everybody's bearing a share of the pain."
The judiciary says the proposed budget, which the House has passed, is about $30 million too low.
Talks over the coming year's budget will get under way in earnest next month. But all indications are that money will continue to be tight. The odds would be against any sort of broad-based tax increase even if this wasn't an election year.
Castille said some legislators recall that the state Supreme Court reinstated a pay raise for the judicial branch after lawmakers had repealed a 2005 law granting higher salaries to themselves, judges and other high-ranking government officials.
Resentment over the pay raise ruling "has lingered since the day we decided the case, and it still lingers, I believe," Castille said. "The Legislature, they're angry, but a lot of them are gone and it's water under the dam."
Castille said the state constitution requires adequate funding for the court system, and he believes the courts — not the General Assembly or the governor — ought to determine how much that is.
"All of these elected officials are sworn to uphold the constitution," Castille said. "They want to violate that oath, that's up to them. They may be paid back during the election process by the citizens."
He said county judges will struggle with mounting caseloads while vacancies remain unfilled and there is less money for senior judges to take up the slack.
"When they have a whole judgeship that's empty for a year and a half, they're going to realize the situation," Castille said. "Maybe they'll talk to their legislators and say, 'Hey, this is a situation you and the governor put us in.' "
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.