Newsmaker: Howard A. Kuhn
Family: Wife, Beverly; daughter, Amy, 48, of Morgantown, W.Va.; and sons Jeffrey, 46, of Indian Trail, N.C., David, 43, of Butler and Stephen, 41, of Rock Hill, S.C.
Occupation: Professor with the University of Pittsburgh's Swanson School of Engineering
Education: Kuhn earned his Bachelor of Science in mechanical engineering in 1962, his Master of Science in mechanical engineering in 1963 and his doctorate in mechanical engineering in 1966, all from Carnegie Mellon University.
Background: Kuhn co-founded Concurrent Technologies Corp., a nonprofit, applied research and development firm in Johnstown, serving as vice president and chief technical officer from 1988-2000. Today, Concurrent employs about 1,500 people, including 850 in Johnstown and 20 in Pittsburgh. He also is the research consultant at The Ex One Company in Irwin, developing a technology known as additive manufacturing, the future of product development. He is a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania.
Noteworthy: Kuhn was awarded the Eli Whitney Productivity Award from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers for development of basic research and commercialization of the powder forging process and titanium forging.
Quote: "I consider this award a tribute to all those people who are involved in advancing and improving manufacturing in the U.S. That's why I'm still here and not retired -- it's a huge issue, and one that needs to continue on. I'm just one of many people dedicated to improving manufacturing and the economic benefit it brings to society."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.