Pennsylvania companies carry heaviest tax burden
Whether young or mature, retail or research-oriented, companies in Pennsylvania are saddled with the worst or near-worst state tax burdens in the nation, according to a comprehensive analysis issued on Wednesday.
According to The Tax Foundation, Pennsylvania ranked 50th for imposing the heaviest overall taxes on mature businesses and 49th in terms of levies on newly established ones.
The nonpartisan research group in Washington called its analysis "a landmark, apples-to-apples comparison of the tax burden states impose on businesses."
Pennsylvania additionally ranked worst for imposing the heaviest taxes on retailers, on research and development centers and on corporate headquarters.
"It starts with your corporate net income tax rate. With Pennsylvania's rate at 9.99 percent, it's not only one of the highest in the nation, it's punitive to both new and existing businesses," said the group's president, Scott Hodge.
Only Iowa's 12 percent corporate net income tax rate is higher than Pennsylvania's.
Gov. Tom Corbett's office said the findings underscore the reason voters elected the Shaler Republican. Corbett campaigned "to change the environment where Pennsylvania ranked at the bottom or near the bottom, and to change business taxes and the business climate," said his spokesman, Kevin Harley.
The foundation compared state and local taxes on business, from levies on net income to real property to sales, and looked at states' tax incentives for job creation or investments. It weighed the factors to arrive at a state's total effective tax rate on retailers, heavy manufacturers and call and distribution centers.
Sales taxes -- 7 percent in Allegheny County and 6 percent elsewhere in Pennsylvania -- largely pushed the state's rank to 50th for taxing mature retailers, and 47th for newer ones.
Western Pennsylvania's research and development centers face the worst tax burdens in the nation, based on property taxes, corporate income taxes and other factors, the foundation said.
Brian Kennedy, vice president of government relations for the Pittsburgh Technology Council, said part of the problem is that the state is relatively stingy with tax credits for businesses that incur net losses. That is common for most early-stage, research-oriented companies, which the council largely represents.
"In just about every other state, they let you carry forward an unlimited amount of your losses" as credits against future tax bills, Kennedy said. "But Pennsylvania allows only $2 million, which has got to be a big factor."
Kennedy said he expects Corbett's proposed reforms — such as lifting the cap on loss credits and lowering the corporate net income tax rate — to "move Pennsylvania out of dead last."
Pennsylvania ranked worst in terms of taxing corporate headquarters, based on the nation's second-highest property taxes, and a form of head tax.
However, several big employers that moved headquarters from Pittsburgh to New York — Alcoa Inc., Bank of New York Mellon Corp. and others — now find themselves in the second-worst state for taxing corporate headquarters, according to the foundation.
"States are not only competing for capital investment against each other, but increasingly, against other countries, many of which have much lower tax rates," Hodge said. "And the further out of step you are, the less able you are to attract investment."
Pennsylvania shines, however, in terms of its taxation of mature, capital-intensive manufacturers, ranking fifth-best in the nation. The state lets companies exclude from income taxation the portion of sales made out of state — a formula that favors heavy manufacturers, which tend to sell products to far-flung places.Additional Information:
How Pennsylvania's last-place ranking for taxing mature businesses, or those 10 years or older, and next-to-last place ranking for taxing newly established businesses compares to neighboring states:
Pennsylvania: 50th, 49th
West Virginia: 48th, 33rd
Ohio: 5th, 3rd
Maryland: 8th, 46th
New York: 42nd, 37th
New Jersey: 41st, 27th
Delaware: 24th, 16th
Source: The Tax Foundation
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Consumer, core prices inch up
- Starkey: Century mark beckons for Ben
- Pitt offense eyes healthy balance
- Highmark seeks double-digit increase for more benefits, heavy use
- The Leader eager for Kittanning finale
- Flyers continue mastery of Penguins at Consol
- Steelers’ defense on pace for fewest sacks in 16-game season
- Canadians more fearful, aware after ‘very rare’ attack in Ottawa
- Corbett rips Wolf tax proposals during Hempfield campaign stop
- Apollo-Ridge school bus safety program aims to drive message home
- Contempt citation sought by state against Highmark for alleged violation of deal with UPMC