Child advocate picked to lead Pittsburgh Promise
Saleem Ghubril, a North Side child advocate, has been hired as executive director of The Pittsburgh Promise, officials of the $250 million scholarship program announced Thursday.
"The Pittsburgh Promise has the potential not only to help kids go to college, but also to leverage significant public school reform as well as community and economic development," said Ghubril, 47, of the North Side.
Funded through a $100 million gift by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the program gives scholarships worth up to $5,000 a year and eventually as much as $10,000 a year to graduates of Pittsburgh Public Schools and its charter schools.
"Saleem has an unrivaled commitment to Pittsburgh and to children," Grant Oliphant, president and CEO of The Pittsburgh Foundation and a member of The Promise's board, said in a prepared statement. "He is an adept fundraiser and knows how to run a high-quality program for young people."
Ghubril founded and has led The Pittsburgh Project since 1985. The nonprofit group has overseen more than 25,000 young people in repairing more than 1,400 homes and mentoring more than 1,500 children. The project has 60 full-time and part-time employees.
Ghubril emigrated at age 16 with his family from war-torn Beirut to Iowa City, Iowa. He received a bachelor's degree in accounting from the University of Iowa and a master of divinity degree from Dubuque Theological Seminary in Iowa.
An ordained Presbyterian minister, Ghubril and his wife, Patti, moved to Pittsburgh in 1984 and live in the North Side. They have two children, Christina, 24, and Nathan, 22.
Ghubril was chosen from among nearly 40 applicants for the position.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.