County eyes veterans' court
Allegheny County judges hope to set up the state's first court devoted to military veterans who get into trouble with the law.
Veterans court would provide options such as counseling and medical treatment -- instead of jail time -- for veterans who commit misdemeanors, said Common Pleas Judge Michael E. McCarthy, a county civil judge.
"This would help veterans who have suffered difficulties due to their military service," said McCarthy, 58, who served as a Navy Seabee during the Vietnam War. Those difficulties could include post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol and drug addiction, he said.
Such alternative courts are aimed at nonviolent offenders whose violations stem from mental illness, substance abuse, or in the case of veterans, PTSD. Instead of incarceration, they offer treatment programs to tackle the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
Allegheny County set up a mental health court in 2001 that places mentally ill people charged with nonviolent crimes with community social services.
The rate of repeat offenders goes down when people participate in alternative courts, said Amy Kroll, director of justice-related services in the county Department of Human Services.
"Alternative courts give individuals a way to recover their lives," Kroll said. "The answer is treatment, treatment and more treatment."
A 2007 RAND Corp. study of the county mental health court showed that only 14 percent of participants committed a crime after going through the program. The recidivism rate for the general population of inmates is 67 percent, the report said.
Alternative courts can save taxpayers money, too. A 2003 National Institute of Justice study that compared a drug court in Multnomah County, Ore., to criminal adjudication showed the drug-court model saved the public more than $2,300 per year for each participant.
The VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System could provide care, if necessary, and fellow veterans would serve as mentors to those appearing before the court, McCarthy said.
"That way, rather than just be adjudicated, we can try to address the problem," McCarthy said. "And veterans seem to respond to each other."
Some of the mentors will come from the Veterans Leadership Program of Western Pennsylvania in the South Side.
"We're going to call on some of those we've assisted through the years to come back and help those that need their help right now," said Albert Mercer, the leadership program's executive director.
Officials in Erie County, N.Y., started what they believe to be the nation's first veterans court a year ago, said acting Erie County Judge Robert Russell. Others now exist in Anchorage, Alaska; Orange County, Calif.; and Tulsa, Okla.
"We took the approach that if we have a judicially oversighted treatment program, maybe we can change their behavior -- get them clean and sober and become productive members of society instead of a burden on society," Russell said.
It's too early for any data to exist on the effectiveness of veterans courts, Russell said.
Karen Blackburn, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's coordinator for problem-solving courts in Harrisburg, visited Russell's court in Buffalo with McCarthy. The Allegheny County program could serve as a statewide model, she said.
State Rep. Don Walko, D-North Side, said he requested a $25,000 state grant to fund a case manager for the veterans court "who will help them get into the right treatment programs."
The first step is to set up a task force and determine a method to identify defendants who are veterans, said Common Pleas Judge John A. Zottola, a criminal judge who presides over the county's mental health court. He said he hopes to have the program running by June.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.