Obama blamed for ACORN's role in census
Pennsylvania's top Republican Party official Thursday criticized President Obama for "trying to inject politics" into the 2010 U.S. Census, a charge the Census Bureau called "baseless and inaccurate."
Party head Bob Gleason accused Obama of "enlisting" the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now to help conduct the census. But the bureau denied that, saying ACORN is one of hundreds of "National Partners" — along with Delta Airlines, FedEx, the AFL-CIO and General Mills — who agreed to provide free advertising and other services. ACORN signed on last month and was a partner for the 2000 census, the bureau said.
Republicans have accused ACORN of voter fraud for its registration efforts during the past three elections. Criticism reached a fever pitch in the 2008 presidential race, with supporters of Republican nominee John McCain decrying the organization at rallies.
A U.S. House Judiciary subcommittee heard testimony yesterday from GOP lawyer Heather Heidelbaugh of Mt. Lebanon and a fired ACORN employee, alleging the organization falsified voter records and violated federal tax and campaign finance laws.
Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., called for a hearing focusing on ACORN, "so we can get to the bottom of this." Jim Sensenbrenner, the ranking Republican on the subcommittee, issued a statement echoing Conyers' call.
"I'm still waiting to hear about one voter who voted and wasn't supposed to," ACORN spokesman Scott Levinson said in an interview after Heidelbaugh's testimony.
Gleason's statement about the census partnership shows continued frustration with the group.
"President Obama is trying to interject politics into the 2010 U.S. census, hoping to increase the reach of his party throughout the country," Gleason said. "It will be tough to trust ACORN's counts or any data they submit."
The bureau said ACORN would have no role in counting people and submit no data to the census. It said partners encourage people to mail forms, and post information about Census Bureau programs on Web sites and in newsletters, among other services. None of the organizations is paid for the work.
"Any charge or claim that a Census Bureau partner could influence or have direct input into census operations is baseless and inaccurate," said Census spokesman Stephen Buckner. "The sole entity that will conduct the 2010 census is the U.S. Census Bureau."
"I believe it is still extremely questionable," said Michael Barkley, state GOP spokesman. "It seems strange that they're involved at all."
ACORN's work would include distributing the bureau's educational materials, donating space for Census employee training and sending an endorsement of the 2010 Census to the 400,000 member families ACORN claims, Levinson said.
Increasing the number of people who respond to the census by mail, which reduces the need for field workers to knock on doors, saved an estimated $85 million in 2000, according to the bureau.
The bureau hires 1.4 million people for the national head count. Each applicant submits to a criminal background check, which includes fingerprinting. None of the work is outsourced, Buckner said.
Census data helps determine the number of U.S. representatives in states; the shape of legislative districts; and how the federal government allocates $300 billion in local aid each year, among other uses. The operation is among the government's largest, and one of the few specific federal projects the U.S. Constitution mandates.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Next hurdle for health care likely tax season
- Legendary ‘Walking Dead’ unit deactivated by Marines
- Pilot in F-15 crash was decorated veteran
- Uzi victim’s family feels sorry for girl, 9, who squeezed trigger
- Rosa Parks items sell for $4.5M
- McDonnell case heads for jurors
- Bucks County Playhouse devotes year to budding lyricists
- Half-ton alligator sets world record
- Astronomers get look at birth of huge galaxy
- House calls for seniors cut costs, study finds
- Child care worker admits stepping on tot, police say