Two feet of snow, canceled classes and pent-up intellect last week inspired a group of Carnegie Mellon professors and students to help people find the best roadways to get from Point A to Point B.
CityzenMobile.net went live Wednesday as a way for people to update the status of their streets — clear, passable or not passable. About 1,500 reports of road conditions had been entered as of this morning. The reports are recorded on an interactive map of Pittsburgh and sent out as updates via Twitter.
The concept was hatched after Prof. Priya Narasimhan noticed people using Twitter to help each find the best routes to get around Pittsburgh during last week's snowstorms.
"People were helping each other find passable roads," said Narasimhan, who teaches in CMU's Electrical & Computer Engineering Department and is president of Yinzcam Inc. "It just seemed like all that could be captured somewhere."
Also involved in the project were doctoral students Nathan Mickulicz and Shahriyar Amini, undergraduate student Max Salley and Prof. Rajeev Gandhi.
"We had nothing to do, so we figured why not help the city we love so much," Narasimhan said. "Honestly, in my heart I didn't know whether this would work or not. But it seems like the floodgates opened."
So many people flooded the Web site that the entries exceeded Twitter's limit of 150 updates per hour, Narasimhan said.
"No one wants to see someone stuck in the snow in front of their house, spinning their tires, when there is a better way around," Narasimhan said. "I think this really speaks to the spirit of the city. Everyone wants to help."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.