NCAA tourney awash in cash
Robert Morris University played one game in this year's NCAA men's basketball tournament but likely earned millions of dollars from the exposure.
Although the team lost its opening round game in overtime to second-seeded Villanova University, traffic to the university's Web site increased 40 percent and the school ranked among top trending topics on Twitter.
Similar exposure when Robert Morris made the tourney last year was worth about $2 million, said spokesman Jonathan Potts. Applications increased 35 percent, but that could be due to a lot of factors, he added.
"It greatly helps our name recognition," Potts said. "There's no doubt about that. The way the game played out this year was a tremendous boost. Short of a victory, we couldn't have written a better story line."
The three-week March Madness tournament, which wraps up tonight with Duke vs. Butler, has grown so popular that National Collegiate Athletic Association officials are talking about making it even bigger — to raise even more money from television rights, sponsorships and other marketing opportunities. In coming weeks, officials might consider expanding the field from 65 teams to 96, or even 128.
More teams means more money, and greater exposure, experts said.
"This is the NCAA's cash cow," said Scott Rosner, associate director of the Wharton Sports Business Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. "As an event, it certainly is one of the bigger ones in the American sports scene."
CBS is paying $617 million this year for the rights to broadcast the entire tournament, and it would pay more than $2.1 billion more over the next three years unless the NCAA decides to get out of the deal and seek more money.
Television ad spending on the tournament totaled $589 million last year, according to Kantar Media, a New York City-based agency that tracks media spending. That's second only to the National Football League playoffs, and more than post-season ad revenue for Major League Baseball, the National Basketball Association or college football.
"It's a major event, and it obviously starts with the TV rights," said Steve Greenberg, sports marketing executive in residence at Duquesne University.
Unlike the Super Bowl, which gives advertisers the largest audience but only one or two shots to reach viewers, the NCAA tournament sustains viewers over 64 games, said Jeremy Mullman, a sports marketing reporter at Advertising Age, an industry magazine in Chicago.
"It's big and it lasts a long time," Mullman said. "You can really just keep hitting them."
The tournament can mean big money for participating schools, experts said.
Under NCAA rules, each conference receives a share of money based on the number of its teams in the tournament and the number of games they play. Teams that survive longer in the playoffs make more money for their conference. It's then up to each conference to distribute the money, either to the winning school or spread among schools.
The Big East, which includes West Virginia University and the University of Pittsburgh, received more than $19 million last year. That was more than any other conference received. The Northeast Conference, which sent Robert Morris University to the tournament, received $1.4 million.
About the only ones not getting paid — at least directly, anyway — are players. They get the benefit of an athletic scholarship and the lifetime benefits that brings, said Rosner, at Wharton.
"Therein lies the rub," he said. "That pales in comparison to the amount of television revenue."
Add Andrew Conte to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hit sends Penguins’ Letang to hospital
- NFL coaches weigh in on Polamalu’s legacy
- Mt. Lebanon native, Iraq war hero’s action goes unrewarded
- Pirates pitchers finding success with expanded strike zone
- Downie’s goal, fight spark Penguins to win over Coyotes
- Pirates notebook: Polanco’s power outburst a matter of timing
- Shortfalls sabotage promise of a union retiree’s pension
- Starkey: Next frontier for Steelers offense
- Probiotic bacteria help conquer ‘superbugs’
- Alvarez latest in Pirates’ revolving door at first base
- South Side house part of former Steeler’s end game