ShareThis Page

Legislative leaders see passage of gas severance tax by Oct. 1

| Monday, July 19, 2010

HARRISBURG — House and Senate leaders say they're confident the General Assembly by Oct. 1 will pass a severance tax on natural gas extracted from the Marcellus shale formation, despite unresolved issues.

Lawmakers recessed for summer this month without reaching agreement on how to tax companies drilling in the deep natural gas reserve, a formation spanning several states including Pennsylvania. Senate Republicans agreed to do so by the fall date as part of a budget deal, in which House Democrats agreed in concept to create an independent budget board that Republicans sought.

The unresolved details are numerous, however, including the tax rate and how to divvy up the revenue among the state and municipal governments in areas where wells are drilled, plus environmental initiatives. The discussion is expected to include how much power local governments would have to regulate drilling-related matters; how companies deal with landowners reluctant to sell drilling rights; and standards for companies cleaning up water used in deep-well drilling.

"Our caucus feels strongly local governments and environmental issues must each receive a fair share," said Erik Arneson, communications and policy director for Senate Republicans.

"The House Democratic Caucus has been committed to this (severance tax) issue for two years," said Brett Marcy, spokesman for Majority Leader Todd Eachus of Hazleton. "We believe big oil and natural gas should pay their fair share of taxes in Pennsylvania and that an extraction tax will help hold these companies accountable so that our communities and environment are protected."

There's no requirement that the House and Senate agree by Oct. 1. The tax vote could occur a little more than a month before lawmakers stand for re-election.

"You can't force people to vote for it," said G. Terry Madonna, political science professor at Franklin & Marshall College. "If they miss the deadline, what happens• Nothing."

One incentive is the state's $5 billion budget deficit in 2011 and the fact the severance tax revenue would grow as the industry develops. A complication is that Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Corbett, the state's attorney general who is leading in the polls, has sworn off new taxes. Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato, the Democratic nominee, supports a limited Marcellus shale tax with money for local governments and the environment.

It will require a "four-caucus deal" — Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate — to push the tax through, said Rep. Tim Solobay, D-Washington County. Without that kind of universal deal, "we could debate this to death," Solobay said.

"The polls show people think this is only fair," he said. If no tax is levied, people would ask "why is this (gas) being given away free?"

Thomas Baldino, political science professor at Wilkes University in Wilkes-Barre, agrees that lawmakers could approve a tax before an election without repercussion.

"This is one of the few taxes ... where more people support it than are against it," Baldino said.

Legislators in districts where heavy drilling is under way could face arguments that heavier taxes could curtail jobs, Baldino said.

Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Dallas, remains undecided. "I am open to a severance tax with several substantial conditions — that the bulk of the revenue generated is dedicated to environmental and community protection, that the plan is not filled with industry sweeteners ... and that the tax rate is not punitive or non-competitive," Baker said.

Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Clarion County, is concerned about regulation of wastewater from wells, her aide Patrick Henderson said. Although open to a tax, she won't support a high rate, he said.

House Appropriations Chairman Dwight Evans, D-Philadelphia, sponsor of the severance tax bill, is "hopeful and optimistic" lawmakers will reach agreement, given public debate that has occurred on the issue, his spokeswoman Johnna Pro said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.