Advocate for veterans draws federal inquiry
The Department of Veterans Affairs is investigating its chief advocate for veteran-owned and small businesses.
Citing privacy rules, VA spokeswoman Katie Roberts said Tuesday she could not provide more information on the status of Timothy J. Foreman, 63, executive director of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization in Washington.
"At this time I can confirm that Mr. Foreman has been put on administrative leave and that an internal investigation is taking place," she said.
The investigation apparently stems from a letter Foreman posted on the VA website seeking to clarify whether the agency was justified in bypassing veteran-owned businesses in dozens of instances.
Though he was on the job just 11 months, Foreman earned praise from veterans who own businesses. Foreman declined to comment.
James Sechrist of Milford in Pike County, a retired federal contracting officer and consultant to disabled veterans, said Foreman served as an advocate for veteran-owned businesses. He said it appeared the VA would punish Foreman for doing his job "too well."
Foreman played a major role in a recent ruling that benefited Powerhouse Design Architects and Engineers, an architectural firm in Station Square. The Government Accountability Office ruled in October the VA should have limited competition for eight design contracts to veteran-owned businesses.
"It would be a major loss for veterans," said Michael Cherock, who heads the veteran-owned business. "There was no one in the VA who was more committed to service-disabled veteran-owned businesses."
A federal employee for 40 years, Foreman previously was director of small business programs for the Navy.
His suspension followed his online posting of a Sept. 7 letter he sent to Will A. Gunn, the VA's general counsel, asking whether it was proper for VA contracting officers to bypass veteran-owned businesses in favor of firms on contract with the General Services Administration. Foreman expressed concern that VA contracting officers were not complying with a federal law mandating preference for veteran-owned businesses.
"If legitimate means exist to ignore this provision of law, we request VA general counsel to articulate those means," Foreman wrote to Gunn.
In July, Foreman dismissed a competitor's complaint against RBVetco, the Scott construction firm formed by retired Steeler running back Rocky Bleier. The company was permitted to resume site preparation at the VA's University Drive campus. Foreman concluded Bleier owned a majority interest in the firm.
A group of veteran-owned business officials yesterday suggested a national campaign to protest Foreman's suspension.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.