ShareThis Page

Ex-Pa. Sen. Santorum to test waters for presidential run

| Sunday, Dec. 12, 2010

NEW YORK -- Former Sen. Rick Santorum on Tuesday will attend a Tea Party event in Davenport, Iowa, as part of the early groundwork for a 2012 presidential run that he says he is "seriously considering."

The one-time Penn Hills Republican elected to the Senate in 1994 and defeated 12 years later is hoping to tap the conservative trend fostered in part by the Tea Party movement and President Obama's unpopularity.

"I'm exploring it," said Santorum. "I'm looking at it. I am kicking the tires."

He made the comment to reporters Saturday while making the rounds at receptions hosted by businesses, law firms, unions, political leaders and lobbyists at the annual Pennsylvania Society gathering in Manhattan.

Santorum's bid is considered a longshot among a dozen or so potential candidates.

But Mark Holman, former chief of staff and strategist for former Republican Gov. Tom Ridge, said Santorum has "better conservative credentials" than many of the other hopefuls including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

"Rick has a great record that's very well respected. He knows it's an uncertain environment. But he certainly has the ability to tap into the Tea Party," he said.

What Holman meant by an uncertain environment is that two years is light- years away in politics: It can't be assumed that the same voter mood will still exist in 2012.

Palin hasn't said she's running but her potential candidacy is the topic of much speculation.

Former Dauphin County Commissioner Nick DeFraceso, a Republican who briefly ran for lieutenant governor this year, said, "I am excited he is exploring the possibilities." Even if the political landscape isn't exactly the same in two years, the undercurrent of the Tea Party movement will still be there in a Republican primary, he said.

"I'm not aware that he has the big fundraising base" needed for a presidential run, said former Democratic state Senator Craig Lewis, of Bucks County.

Santorum says it's "a wide open race" and voters "want someone with a vision" for America's future.

Santorum lost his Senate seat to Democrat Robert Casey in 2006. He had been elected to the House in 1990 where he gained a reputation as a firebrand as part of the so-called "Gang of Seven" who brought to light a House banking scandal.

State Sen. Jake Corman, R-Center County, said yesterday he is considering running for the U.S. Senate against Casey in 2012.

Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield, says she has been approached by Republican party officials who want her to run for the U.S. Senate, but she is far from making a decision.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.