ShareThis Page

RNC head says Democrats have a big problem with the economy

| Thursday, June 2, 2011

Pick a problem facing the Republican Party — an unsettled presidential field, disgruntled social conservatives, slim support among minorities — and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus says Democrats have one that's bigger: the state of the economy.

"The message that will drive the 2012 election is an economic message," Priebus said in an interview on Wednesday while in Pittsburgh to meet with donors.

But who will occupy the driver's seat for Republicans is far from settled. Candidates range from culture warrior and former Sen. Rick Santorum of Penn Hills to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who signed a health care law for his state similar to the national overhaul Democrats passed in 2009. A Pew Research/Washington Post poll released yesterday found 42 percent of Republicans are "unimpressed" with the candidates.

The primary campaign will help sort that out, Priebus said.

"The diverse field ... is a good thing for our side," Priebus said. The contest excites the base, draws media attention and strengthens the ultimate winner, he said. "Look what it did for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. It worked out pretty good for them."

In the end, a slow recovery from a deep recession, unemployment that remains higher than when President Obama took office and a national debt that's growing by more than $1 trillion a year will trump everything else voters care about, Priebus said. The more the presidential race focuses on the country's economy, "the better it's going to be for our party," he said.

"Chairman Priebus and his party are woefully out of touch with the middle-class Americans that Democrats are working tirelessly for," said Democratic National Committee spokesman Michael Czin.

The economic focus doesn't bode well for the sway social conservatives might hold over the party's direction, said Gerald Shuster, professor of presidential rhetoric at the University of Pittsburgh.

"The winners are going to be those who can find a way to deal with the economy," Shuster said. "People want something on the table that is specific and precise and that they can relate to. The economic solution pablum that's been offered so much in the past is just not going to work this time. Too many people have suffered and continue to suffer."

One of the few specific deficit-reduction plans Congress has offered — GOP Rep. Paul Ryan's plan to turn Medicare into a voucher program for people ages 54 or younger — sparked a backlash against changing the popular entitlement.

"While Chairman Priebus and Republicans have been busy trying to end Medicare, the Obama administration has created 2.1 million private-sector jobs over 14 consecutive months of job growth, rescued the American automobile industry and prevented the recession of 2008 from becoming another Great Depression," Czin said.

Priebus believes that by using entitlement reform as a political bludgeon rather than offering solutions, Democrats risk bankrupting Medicare. He accused Obama, who didn't include entitlement reform in his 2012 budget proposal, of "whistling past the graveyard."

Priebus came to Pittsburgh as part of a national tour to repair relationships with high-dollar donors. Many of those donors were unhappy with the stewardship of previous RNC Chairman Michael Steele, said Alex Castellanos, a Republican strategist who advised Steele.

Disaffected donors last year turned to third-party groups, which spent hundreds of millions of dollars on political ads. But election law bars those groups from working with campaigns — something the RNC can do.

"I need to rebuild credibility and trust. I need to bring donors back to the national committee, because without a functional, operational RNC, we can't defeat Barack Obama," Priebus said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.