Veterans Affairs' funeral policy inflames area veterans
When Chester Prinkey presents a flag to a veteran's next of kin at a funeral, he says, "May God bless you and your family."
According to a national policy, he needs consent from the deceased's family before doing so.
The policy has ignited controversy and a lawsuit in Houston over how a national cemetery director enforced it this year. The Veterans Affairs policy, adopted under President Bush in 2007, prohibits religious recitations in volunteer honor guards' funeral rituals without prior family consent. The policy came about after families complained about religious words being said during services without requests for them to be included.
Western Pennsylvania veterans and some congressmen who are watching the Houston case are appalled.
"There are no atheists in the foxhole," said Prinkey, 66, of Connellsville. He is a member of the Mountain Honor Guard, made up of members of VFW Posts 265 in Farmington and 12019 in Normalville. Members of the guard -- sometimes a dozen at a time -- attend about 10 military funerals a year where they offer a rifle salute and play taps before presenting the family with a flag.
In the pending federal lawsuit in Texas, Veterans of Foreign Wars District 4, American Legion Post 586 and the National Memorial Ladies accuse Veterans Affairs officials at the Houston National Cemetery of censorship. The Liberty Institute, a Texas-based legal group, is helping represent the groups in court.
The lawsuit says VA officials barred prayer and religious speech in burials at the Houston cemetery unless families submit a specific prayer or message in writing to the cemetery's director. The lawsuit also accuses VA officials of not allowing the use of words such as "God" or "Jesus."
Jo Schuda, a VA spokeswoman in Washington, said the allegation that the department banned religious words is false. She defended the policy.
"It allows families to determine what they want to have said," she said. "I don't believe anything's been done that shouldn't have been done."
Some veterans see it as an attack on their freedom of speech.
"Personal freedom is one of the many noble ideals that our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines fight for," said Mike Mauer, 50, quartermaster of Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 914 in West Mifflin, which has an honor guard. "Nobody fights to protect uncaring bureaucratic rules."
In a written statement, VA spokesman Josh Taylor said the agency "would like to emphasize that we care deeply that the First Amendment rights of the families of those patriots who are interred in our national cemeteries, and the rights of all who visit these national shrines, are fully respected."
In July, Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, and 25 other members of Congress signed a letter to Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki calling for the removal of Houston National Cemetery Director Arleen Ocasio.
"Families of all denominations and religious beliefs, particularly at a time of grieving, are afforded under the Constitution the right to express their religion and find comfort in expressions of their faith," Murphy said. "For a government agency to restrict that constitutional right of those who died fighting for it is particularly egregious."
The cemetery referred a request for comment from Ocasio to the VA.
Ronald Hestdalen, director of the National Cemetery of the Alleghenies in Cecil, said his staff "does not interfere with individual's rights to express religious beliefs."
"We only ask that everything is done with honor and dignity," he said.
At the cemetery, families can request full military honors from the Department of Defense, which do not include religious references. Representatives from VFWs and American Legions often work in conjunction with them, he said. Cemetery officials are not privy to what will be said during the service beforehand, Hestdalen said. It is up to the family to request that anything be omitted from any ritual.
Kirk Leopard, regional director for the National Cemetery Administration's northeast region, said the 33 cemeteries in his jurisdiction have "never had this problem."
"Just like in the military, we don't get into a family's religious preference," he said. "We do what the family wants to do."
Prinkey, a Vietnam War veteran, said the elimination of religious words "takes away from the message" of the VFW's funeral rituals. Fifteen years ago, Prinkey found himself the survivor of a veteran when his son, Barry, died at 30 from a brain tumor.
Barry Prinkey had followed in the footsteps of his father, as well as his World War II veteran grandfather, and enlisted in the Navy before completing school. He is buried in Grafton National Cemetery in West Virginia.
Prinkey said he would have been "appalled at the idea" of honor guards needing his permission to use religious words at his son's funeral. At that time, banning words like "God" from a service was "something nobody ever would have thought about," he said.
"There wasn't a question about it," he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Federal appeals court flips on cell location records ruling in Florida
- State AGs lambaste climate proposal, predicting higher electricity prices, job losses
- 56 years later, Ohio fugitive captured in Florida
- Texas attack called ‘textbook’ lone-wolf case
- Familiarity guides Obama’s picks to lead Joint Chiefs
- AG vows to help better Baltimore police
- $5.6B in education tax credits dubious
- First, ‘Watson’ wins ‘Jeopardy’; now, he helps treat cancer
- VA probe ‘for show,’ cardiologist claims
- Researchers find new, elusive bird species
- Thousands of Lerner’s emails found, reviving probe