Corbett won't rush plan to increase transportation funding
Gov. Tom Corbett said on Friday he is in no rush to offer a long-term plan to increase transportation funding, despite calls to put more money right away toward Pennsylvania's crumbling infrastructure and strained transit systems.
"I don't have a deadline in mind of this year. This General Assembly ends in November 2012," Corbett said after delivering a speech Downtown at the eighth annual Waterways Symposium.
A Corbett-appointed advisory commission released a plan to the governor in August that it said would increase transportation funding up to $2.7 billion annually within five years. Corbett said he has been reviewing the commission's plan while evaluating alternatives. He did not identify the other options.
Corbett said he is concerned that now might not be the right time to implement one of the commission's key recommendations: increasing vehicle and driver fees to account for inflation since previous increases, a move that would generate an additional estimated $574 million annually within five years.
Corbett also said several other major legislative issues are being considered in Harrisburg, including ones related to Marcellus shale drilling and school vouchers.
"We're in a very difficult time," Corbett said.
Sen. Jake Corman, R-Centre County, agreed, but said Pennsylvanians will pay more for transportation one way or another. That's why he said he will introduce his own transportation funding bill next week, resembling the advisory commission's report.
"If it's not fees, they'll pay through detours, closed roads and bridges, wear and tear on their vehicles, congestion," Corman, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said yesterday. "We're going to pay either way as citizens. It seems to make more sense to fix the problems."
Corman and other legislators have said it's also important to move funding legislation through this year for political reasons. Next year is an election year for most legislators, and any legislation including increases in driver fees could be unpopular.
"It will not be able to move without the governor, so it comes down to him being supportive," Corman said. "Still, I think it's important for the Legislature to tell the governor, 'Hey, this is important.' "
Corbett said he would review the bill when it's introduced.
Allegheny Conference on Community Development CEO Dennis Yablonsky applauded Corman.
"We cannot afford to wait. The time to act is now," Yablonsky said.
Martin Pietrucha, director of the Pennsylvania Transportation Institute at Penn State University, agreed and called the state's transportation problems "dire."
Focusing on bridges, Pietrucha said Pennsylvania has roughly a third of the nation's more than 18,000 structurally deficient bridges. Among the 102 largest metro areas, Pittsburgh has the highest percentage of bridges in poor shape, a national report released this week showed.
"If this isn't a crisis, I don't know what is," Pietrucha said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.