NAACP mobilizes against voter ID bill
The NAACP's Pittsburgh branch is mobilizing to oppose a bill that would require Pennsylvanians to show identification before voting.
The organization on Wednesday likened the importance of the effort to ones that resulted in the abolishment of poll taxes. Members called on city residents to sign and help circulate petitions. They called on ministers to shout it down from their pulpits.
"The African-American community across the country fought long and hard to be able to vote," said NAACP President M. Gayle Moss. "This is a tactic to reduce the number of senior citizen voters, African-American voters, who do not have cars or drive, and young voters."
State Rep. Daryl D. Metcalfe, who sponsored the bill, said his intent is exactly the opposite. The legislation, he said, will protect those voters and ensure honest balloting. The Cranberry Republican said he was surprised at the NAACP's response.
"You have to question whether they want fair elections or want to have fraud continued to be perpetrated," he said.
The bill, which Democrats generally oppose, would require voters to show state or federally issued photo identification. It passed the state House in June and is now in the Senate State Government Committee, which voted earlier this month to expand the list of acceptable types of identification. Metcalfe said the bill now permits photo identification issued by colleges and universities in Pennsylvania and nursing and personal care homes.
Under state law, voters must show identification when voting for the first time at their poll.
Legislation is pending in more than 30 states to require voters to show ID. Seven states, including Alabama, Kansas, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin and Mississippi, already have laws on the books, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Metcalfe cited voter fraud arrests of ACORN workers in Pittsburgh and the submission by ACORN workers of 8,000 fraudulent voter registration forms in Philadelphia several years ago as evidence that the law is needed. ACORN, or the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is a defunct activist group.
"We've seen efforts to perpetrate that kind of fraud," he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Justices consider social media, free speech
- Heart stent implanted, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg goes home
- McCarthy-era felon: Lies doomed me
- Cathedral may host slave trade museum
- Fewer adults smoking, U.S. survey finds
- National Guard reinforcements contain damage in Ferguson
- E-cigarettes cut cravings, study finds
- House GOP sues Obama administration over federal health care law
- Feds put brakes on green energy edict of renewable fuel standard
- Test vaccine to fight Ebola promising
- U.S., European law enforcement sweep into corners of ‘dark web’