Catholic voters in many states shy away from preachy Santorum
As a devout Mormon, Mitt Romney was the presidential candidate who experts anticipated could have a problem with winning over Roman Catholic voters.
Instead, exit polling from recent primaries shows Rick Santorum, a staunch Catholic who often references his religion as a factor in his political views, is winning far less of the Catholic vote than Romney. The former senator from Pennsylvania has yet to achieve outright victory among Catholics in any state for which data are available, according to Pew Research Center's Forum on Religion & Public Life analysis.
"He comes across as too righteous to resonate with the majority of the electorate, in my humble opinion. He complicates the message," said Joe O'Rourke, 39, a practicing Catholic from Houston who books hotel rooms for oil and gas industry workers. In 2004, O'Rourke took a leave of absence to volunteer for President Bush's re-election campaign in Pennsylvania.
Kristi Storti, 40, a Catholic from Cranberry, finds Santorum's conviction refreshing.
"There are too many people that claim to be Catholic and are not practicing or are two-timers, only go to church at Christmas or Easter," Storti said. "They do not follow the Catholic dialogue or doctrine. I think Santorum reminds them of this. These are the people who are likely turning away from him."
Data that Pew compiled using CNN exit polling from last week's Super Tuesday contests show Catholics preferred Romney in Ohio and Massachusetts, where he was governor. Romney and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a recent Catholic convert, divided the Catholic vote in Georgia; Romney and Santorum split the Catholic vote in Tennessee. The data did not include U.S. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, whose campaign largely focuses on caucus states.
Romney gets less support from voters for whom it's important to have a candidate who shares their religious beliefs, the Pew analysis showed. In Ohio, Santorum edged Romney 40 percent to 36 percent among voters who attach at least some importance to sharing religious beliefs with a candidate. Protestants' and evangelicals' voting preferences varied.
A Rasmussen survey of likely Republican voters released on Friday showed a three-way tie between Gingrich, Santorum and Romney in Alabama. In Mississippi, Rasmussen found Romney leading those two rivals by 8 percentage points, with 35 percent. Both states will hold primaries on Tuesday.
Among Catholics, Santorum's message could be put to the test again in Illinois on March 20 and in later contests in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, said Burt Rockman, a political science professor at Purdue University in Indiana. In earlier primaries, CNN exit polling showed Romney won the Catholic vote in New Hampshire, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan and Florida.
"It really is stunning and kind of interesting that Santorum is losing Republican Catholics," Rockman said. "Catholic-rich upcoming primary states ... are going to be a problem for his viability."
America's Catholics largely are mainstream voters, said Catherine Wilson, a Villanova University expert on religions' impact on politics.
"As a whole, they tend to view their faith as private and are unaccustomed to discussing the content of their faith in public," she said.
Given the progressive, moderate and traditional strains within the Catholic vote, it is difficult to predict the outcome of November's election. Catholics constitute 25 percent of eligible U.S. voters, and their vote is not a slam-dunk for either party, Wilson said.
Research shows Catholics can become the quintessential swing voters among people of faith, Wilson said, because they hold positions on social issues that largely mirror the general population. A 2009 Gallup poll, for example, found 40 percent of Catholics and 41 percent of non-Catholics consider abortion to be morally acceptable; 67 percent of Catholics and 57 percent of non-Catholics said the same about premarital sex, she said.
Across the board, churchgoing Catholics hold more progressive views than non-Catholic churchgoers, Wilson said.
Santorum became Romney's closest competitor in the race in early February after surprise wins in three caucus states, although political strategists largely considered those results "beauty contests" because they netted him no delegates to the Republican National Convention.
Once in the spotlight, Santorum began muddling his message with religion. He talked about contraception, adopting church doctrine against it.
Then he said he wanted to "throw up" the first time he read President John F. Kennedy's speech on separation of church and state. Kennedy, the nation's only Catholic president, needed to convince voters that his faith would not interfere with governing.
Many Catholics tend to agree with JFK that one's faith should not be a central influence in presidential decision-making, said Wilson.
"They are interested in having a candidate run for office who is less a preacher than a real presidential contender," she said.
Santorum turned off other Catholics when he ridiculed President Obama as a "snob" for saying that everyone should have a shot at a college education, said O'Rourke in Texas, which votes May 29.
"College is the American dream for ethnic Catholic parents," O'Rourke said.Additional Information:
Catholics a diverse lot
• 65 percent white
• 29 percent Hispanic
• 6 percent black, Asian or mixed race
In 2008, 54 percent of Catholics voted for Democrat Barack Obama.
Source: Catherine Wilson, Villanova University
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.