Altmire taking heat over ads attacking Critz
The second-ranking Democrat in the U.S. House issued a second rebuke to a Western Pennsylvania Democrat over ads he's running in a bitter primary race.
U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire accuses Rep. Mark Critz of endangering entitlement programs because he voted "present" rather than against a Republican budget. Critz's vote was a procedural move engineered by Democratic leadership to embarrass Republicans. On Friday, the architect of that tactic, Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., again accused Altmire of distorting what his fellow Democrats were trying to do.
"I am disappointed that negative advertisements continue to mislead Pennsylvania voters," Hoyer said in a statement released through Critz's campaign. "The fact is that Mark Critz stood with Democrats in an effort to derail the extreme Republican budget that would have ended Medicare."
Reps. Bob Brady, D-Philadelphia and Jan Schakowsky, D-Chicago, have also accused Altmire of misleading people. Altmire, 44, D-McCandless, said people haven't complained to him.
"No one has said anything to me," Altmire said.
Hoyer defended Critz, 50, D-Johnstown, in March after Altmire's first television ad on the subject. Yesterday, Hoyer went a step further, criticizing a GOP Balanced Budget Amendment that Altmire supported, and which Critz's attack ads have featured.
"Mark also opposed the Republican Balanced Budget Amendment that would have gutted Medicare and Social Security," Hoyer said.
Altmire defends his support of the amendment, saying the country's exploding deficit threatens the popular entitlement programs.
Republicans pitted Altmire and Critz against each other when they redrew congressional boundaries last year. The winner of Tuesday's primary will take on Edgeworth Republican Keith Rothfus, 49, in November.
Critz said Hoyer sought him out on the House floor this week and offered to help him push back against Altmire's attack.
"It infuriated him," Critz said. By criticizing the budget vote, Altmire is "throwing Steny under the bus because it was his strategy."
Asked if the spat would make him a less effective legislator, Altmire said: "What is of interest to me is representing my constituents. They sent me to Washington to speak for them and on that vote, that's what I was doing. I'm going to continue to take a stand on every vote ... I think the way I can be most effective is representing my constituents."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.