Wecht prosecutor returns to private practice
The prosecutor who headed the federal public corruption cases against Dr. Cyril H. Wecht and the Allegheny County Sheriff's Office is crossing the aisle.
Yesterday was the last day in the U.S. Attorney's Office for Stephen Stallings, who heads down Grant Street from the federal courthouse to go into private practice at Dreier, a law firm in the Koppers Building.
"Most of my career has been in private practice," said Stallings, 40. "And this was the right time for me and my family to make the return."
The failure to convict Wecht was not a factor in deciding to leave, Stallings said.
'Gateways' to get facelifts
Two deteriorating pedestrian "gateways" in the lower North Side could get much-needed overhauls.
Mayor Luke Ravenstahl yesterday targeted railway underpasses on Anderson and Sandusky streets for extensive repairs including new sidewalks and curbs, bright lighting, fresh paint and landscaping.
The pathways beneath the tracks connect streets surrounding PNC Park and other North Shore attractions to Allegheny Center.
Anderson Street will be overhauled first at a cost of about $1.8 million, Public Works Director Guy Costa said.
It will be paid for with city and federal money.
Woman sues after fall from bar
A Whitehall woman sued a North Shore bar, claiming she severely injured her leg after falling off a bar while dancing.
Ashley M. Sauer filed a lawsuit yesterday in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court against McFadden's Pittsburgh, which is on North Shore Drive near PNC Park.
The lawsuit states that Sauer was encouraged to dance on the bar in March 2007. She slipped and struck a cooler, fracturing her right knee and suffering ligament damage and a blood clot, according to the lawsuit.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.