Bush's presidential tenure leaves a short paper trail
DALLAS (Ersatz News Service) -- The upcoming George W. Bush Presidential Library might be smaller than initially planned because of a lack of presidential papers produced during Bush's eight years in office.
Architects designing the facility, scheduled to be built next year on the Southern Methodist University campus, today confirmed the space required to house the presidential documents will be far less than it originally anticipated.
Peter Keating of the New York-based architectural firm Francon & Heyer, said the company came to that realization after the White House recently performed an exhaustive inventory of the documents.
"The president obviously has not been a prodigious note-taker, because the paperwork fit comfortably in a single cardboard box in a small utility closet just off the Oval Office," Keating said.
He added: "From an architectural standpoint, you don't need an exceptionally large structure in which to house a half-dozen manila folders filled with half-formed thoughts, various doodles and discarded Tootsie Roll wrappers."
A spokesman for the Bush Repository Foundation, which is overseeing the project, said the dearth of documents hardly should be construed as a negative.
"Honestly, most of the stuff you find in other presidential libraries just sits around collecting dust," the spokesman said
"The relatively few papers the president has produced are informative, enlightening and -- in the case of his many goofy renderings of Saddam Hussein as a chicken, goat or other barnyard animal -- often quite entertaining."
The spokesman scoffed at the notion the building might end up smaller than initially conceived.
"All the recent inventory means is that we're now guaranteed plenty of space for the vending machines, the workout treadmills and the driving range," he said.
In related news, outgoing vice president Dick Cheney's staff disclosed that his library and museum, which will be totally underwritten by Halliburton, will be built entirely underground at a location that will not be disclosed to the general public.
"For security reasons, the library's address will be divulged only on a need-to-know basis," newly hired curator I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby said . "Trust me -- it will be more difficult to unearth this library's whereabouts than it is to obtain the identity of a covert CIA operative."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.