Share This Page

Export adamant about getting post office

Export officials say they want a post office in the borough once again and will not settle for anything less.

A post office has been a high priority for the community of about 900 since the facility's doors closed in June 2008. A committee was appointed to work to re-establish an office, and a few building owners have submitted bids for a new location.

During Tuesday night's meeting, Councilwoman Melanie Litz read a letter she received from Charles McCreadie, a district manager for the Postal Service in Pittsburgh, stating the Postal Service was exploring a location for a contract postal unit in the Export area.

"Basically, it's just a counter that sells stamps in an already existing building," said Litz, who has spearheaded the efforts to re-establish an office. "This is not the way Export wants to go. This is an easy way out for the post office."

Litz said she contacted Rep. Jason Altmire and hopes to meet with the congregation concerning the post office. She also wants the meeting to include McCreadie.

"They're really trying to get out of what they promised us back in July 2008," Litz said of the postal service's proposal to provide an office staffed by a postal worker.

Councilman John Nagoda echoed Litz's sentiments and suggested a response to McCreadie's correspondence detailing the feelings of borough officials.

"I think we should respond to that letter and tell them we will support what we were promised," Nagoda said.

The motion was approved by the six council members in attendance. Councilman George Wood was absent last night.

The post office on Kennedy Avenue closed its doors for good after Arthur Spagnol, the building's landlord, decided not to negotiate a new lease with the postal service. Spagnol, who had owned the building since 1962, said it was too expensive to make the renovations the postal service wanted.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.