South Huntingdon man pleads guilty to gun, drug charges
A South Huntingdon man who state Attorney General Tom Corbett described a year ago as a major cocaine supplier in the region pleaded guilty this week to two federal narcotics and firearms violations.
Rashika J. "Sheik" Porter, 33, of 2195 First St., Wyano, is facing a potential sentence of up to life in prison and a $4 million fine when he is sentenced Oct. 15 by U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose in Pittsburgh.
According to assistant U.S. attorneys Margaret E. Picking and Barbara K. Swartz, Porter, who was convicted of trafficking cocaine in Allegheny County in 2003, was found in possession of a 9 mm Glock pistol on March 27, 2007, by his parole officer. As a convicted felon, Porter is prohibited from possessing firearms.
More than a year later, on Nov. 16, 2008, Porter was arrested when police say he attempted to sell six kilograms of cocaine -- more than 13 pounds -- for $188,000 to an undercover state narcotics agent.
Porter was arrested as part of a two-year investigation that began in 2006 by the state Attorney General's office. It led to complaints against 10 other mid-level cocaine traffickers who operated in Allegheny and Westmoreland counties.
The charges were filed at the recommendation of a statewide investigative grand jury.
Pending sentencing, Ambrose continued Porter's detention.
In addition to agents from Corbett's office, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives assisted with the investigation.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.