Murrysville remains ID'd as missing man, 74
By Paul Peirce
Published: Saturday, July 24, 2010,
The Westmoreland County Coroner's Office has positively identified the skeletal remains discovered July 12 in Murrysville as those of a 74-year-old man who disappeared in that area two years ago.
Latrobe dentist Scott Learn, a forensic odontologist, used dental records to positively identify the remains as those of Wilbert Darr, Chief Deputy Paul Cycak Jr. said.
Cycak said the cause and manner of Darr's death are under further examination and reconstruction by a team of forensic anthropologists from Mercyhurst College in Erie, who helped recover the remains in a wooded area off Hickory Hill Road.
Darr was reported missing after he left his home on nearby Glendale Lane for an evening walk May 27, 2008.
Darr, who was in fairly good health except for a heart ailment, did not carry a cell phone or credit cards, and he left home without identification or medication. His wife, Margaret, said that he enjoyed walking in the woods.
The remains were located about a mile from his residence. The privately owned land encompasses about 70 acres and includes three gas wells surrounded by brush, a neighbor said.
Darr's wife declined to comment Friday.
When he disappeared, firefighters, dogs, volunteers and police helicopters began an intense search to no avail. There was no sign of Darr until two men spraying weeds in a remote area of Murrysville discovered the remains nearly two weeks ago.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.