St. Vincent College student faces porn charges
A 19-year-old St. Vincent College student was charged with sexual abuse of children after he dropped off a personal computer at the college to be repaired and pornographic footage of children was found on the hard drive, state police said.
According to a criminal complaint filed with District Judge Michael Mahady in Latrobe, the charges filed against Tyler Jacob Hess of 527 Nagle Road, Erie, on July 21 stem from an April 19 incident.
In the complaint, Trooper Robert Burford states that Hess dropped off his personal laptop at the college's student-work program, saying it possibly had a virus and asking that it be repaired.
Students working on the computer discovered photos and video footage of child pornography, and police were contacted.
The computer was confiscated and a search warrant was served on Hess. When a forensic analysis was performed on Hess' computer, files were found containing a large number of images indicative of child pornography. Police said many child pornography files were located in a folder along with three subfolders marked "Best," "Good" and "Rare." Each subfolder contained child pornography video files, police said.
The complaint states that the charge includes the possession or control of photographs, video footage, computer depiction or other material depicting a child younger than 18 engaging in a prohibited or simulated sexual act.
Hess is listed as a freshman member of the 2010 St. Vincent Bearcats baseball team.
He faces a preliminary hearing Aug. 30 before Mahady.
Don Orlando, spokesman for St. Vincent College, declined comment yesterday.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.