Killer's appeal again denied for murder of two girls in Monessen
An appeal filed by a former Monessen man in prison for more than three decades for killing two young children was denied Friday.
Westmoreland County Judge Debra Pezze rejected an argument by John Veltre Jr., 54, who claimed that because he was convicted of first-degree murder as a 16-year-old in the late 1970s, he could not be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Veltre was convicted for the 1973 deaths of 2-year-old Sandra Dee Morgan, and her 3-month-old sister, Tina. According to court records, Veltre threw both children into a wall, stomping on the older child, after he raped their mother and left her unconscious in her Monessen home.
Veltre's appeal focused on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that precludes life prison sentences for juveniles convicted of crimes other than homicides.
Pezze rejected Veltre's argument, saying the Supreme Court ruling did not apply because Veltre was convicted of homicide.
Veltre pleaded guilty to two counts of first-degree murder and other related offenses, but in 1978, a state appeals court ordered that he be given a new trial. The appeals court ruled Veltre did not knowingly and voluntarily agree to plead guilty.
Later in 1978, a Westmoreland County jury found Veltre guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and rape and sentenced him to the same term originally imposed after the guilty plea --two concurrent life prison terms, plus an additional five to 20 years for rape.
Over the years, Veltre has repeatedly appealed his conviction and sentence, always maintaining his innocence.
Veltre asked that his sentenced be modified to make him eligible for parole.
He wrote his appeal from his prison cell at the State Correctional Institution at Frackville in Schuylkill County.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.