Woman says boyfriend held knife to her throat
A Mt. Pleasant Township man is accused of holding a knife to his girlfriend's throat and choking her on Christmas Eve.
Joshua T. Neiderhiser, 24, who lists his address as 2889 Route 31, Acme, is charged with aggravated assault, harassment and simple assault in connection with the alleged incident at 11:30 p.m. Dec. 24.
According to an affidavit of probable cause filed before Ligonier District Judge Denise Snyder Thiel, state police were summoned to the woman's Donegal residence where Trooper Donald Shirey reported he noticed small cuts on the woman's neck and contusions on her elbow.
The victim, who described Neiderhiser as her boyfriend, said he became enraged, demanding she admit to cheating on him while he was serving time in prison last year on a theft charge.
According to the affidavit, the victim alleges Neiderhiser "held a knife to her throat and choked her" during the assault. Police said the victim alleged that when she attempted to flee the residence, Neiderhiser "drug her back into the residence by her hair."
Neiderhiser was arraigned Christmas Day before Washington Township District Judge Elise Glenn and released after posting $5,000 bond. A preliminary hearing is tentatively scheduled Jan. 7 before Thiel.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.