ShareThis Page

$3,300 in items taken from self-storage unit in Irwin

| Friday, April 8, 2011

Irwin police are investigating a recent incident of burglary and theft from a self-storage unit in the borough, in which items valued at more than $3,300 were taken.

Chief Joseph K. Pocsatko said the lock to the storage unit at the Conley Inn, 108 Conley Drive, was removed and a cabinet inside the unit entered, sometime between March 31 and Monday.

Items taken include a grinder and polisher, an electric drill, a Rotary laser level, a circular saw, a reciprocating saw, a framing nailer, a 42-inch flat screen television, a Dell computer, Nintendo DS, Playstation PSP and video games. Loss was set at $3,321.49.

Pocsatko said it was the first time he was aware of a burglary at the unit. He said similar reports in the borough are rare.

Customers place their own locks on the units, Pocsatko said.

"(The renter) went down to check on it and he noticed these items missing," Pocsatko said. He advised storage unit renters to invest in a good lock.

"Make sure it's a quality, heavy duty lock, one that is not easily broken or cut off," he said.

Pocsatko asked that other police departments with similar incidents, or that happen to come across any of the stolen items, contact him.

Police will provide extra patrols at the site, he said, and the investigation will continue.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.