Westmoreland buys more voting machines
Westmoreland County Election Bureau officials are trying to avoid a repeat of the long lines of voters who waited to cast ballots in the last presidential election.
So the county has purchased 21 additional touch-screen computer voting machines to ease the crush of voters in the largest precincts.
"In the larger elections, such as a presidential race, I feel we need more machines in some of our larger precincts," said bureau Director Jim Montini.
The county has 306 precincts and some of the larger locations, such as Hempfield and Unity townships, and in Murrysville, have up to seven machines in place for voting.
The additional machines will be used to alleviate waits in those precincts, Montini said.
Long lines formed at some precincts during the 2008 presidential election, causing the county to keep precincts open up to 90 minutes after the 8 p.m. closing time to allow all voters queued up to cast ballots.
The county will pay $48,700 to Election Systems & Software Inc. of Omaha for the additional machines. Montini said that expense will be reimbursed by the federal government.
In 2005, Westmoreland County paid $3 million from a federal grant to purchase its initial batch of more than 750 computer voting machines. They replaced the mechanical-lever machines that had been used for the previous 50 years. The touch-screen system has been used for the last five years with minor problems.
Montini said the new purchase will increase the county's supply of voting machines to more than 840 available for use in the Nov. 8 general election.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.