Yough School Board OKs budget without tax hike
Yough School District taxpayers will not see an increase in property tax if the proposed budget approved on Thursday night is adopted as presented.
The school board approved a proposed 2011-12 spending plan with balanced revenues and expenditures of $27,704,844 by a unanimous vote, keeping the tax rate of 75.6 mills.
The plan assumes a 92 percent collection rate on real estate taxes, with a value per mil of $121,141 and total assessment value of $131,674,820.
The proposed budget will be available for public comment for 30 days. The board is expected to adopt the final budget on June 16.
In another matter, the board received a report on the audit of accounting practices for the 2009-10 fiscal year.
Joel Kunkle of the accounting firm Herbein & Co. Pittsburgh, said, "Our opinion is an unqualified opinion, meaning that there are no material misstatements in your financial statements based upon our audit."
Kunkle noted that for the year ended June 30, 2010, revenues exceeded expenditures by $1,887,000, which included about $1.7 million in American Recovery & Reconciliation Act funds.
"Without the ARRA funds, you still would have had a net profit or an excess of revenues over expenditures of about $200,000. A lot of school districts are not in that position," he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Flight 93 memorial fire hints at struggle to safeguard historic artifacts
- DEP orders cleanup of former Jeannette Glass property to resume
- Route 217 bridge across Loyalhanna Creek reopens early
- The real Captain Phillips brings story of piracy to St. Vincent College
- Southwest Greensburg man died of injuries in accident in Bell
- Laurel Mountain State Park ski plans will go to Ligonier Township supervisors
- Corbett rips Wolf tax proposals during Hempfield campaign stop
- Former Ligonier Township supervisor accused of abusing position, viewing porn on the job
- Missing Southwest Greensburg man found dead at crash site in Bell
- Attorney: Indiana County suspect not fit for trial in fatal Derry shooting
- Mt. Pleasant man injured when tractor hit by vehicle