ShareThis Page

Final version of Norwin's budget holds tax rate steady

| Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Norwin school directors formally approved a 2011-12 budget Monday night that features no property tax increase.

Directors worked with administrators on a $56.71 million budget, which is a $1.37 million decrease in spending from the fiscal year that closes at the end of the month. Officials relied on about $480,000 from the district's $4 million fund balance to complete the spending plan.

After raising taxes by 1.85 mills last year, the board kept the tax rate at 65.8 mills. The district collects another 1.2 mills for the Norwin Public Library.

District officials said the average tax levy for a Norwin residential taxpayer is $1,473.

Both the homestead and farmstead exclusions for property owners will be $89.98.

Among the new initiatives in the 2011-12 budget are a secondary robotics curriculum and camps and an updated instructional technology, writing and health curriculum at the elementary level.

Also last night, the board reviewed a recent demographic and enrollment study completed by Ingraham Dancu Associates for $14,200. One of the directors, Tom Sturm, suggested last year that the district conduct another study to update information presented about a decade ago by a Carnegie Mellon University professor.

Daniel Dancu, the consulting firm's president, said the population for the district's communities of North Huntingdon, Irwin and North Irwin increased by 3.08 percent to 35,428 after the 2010 Census, although the number of children younger than 5 fell by 1.33 percent and the number of children younger than 18 dropped by almost 11 percent.

Yet steady development in the district should help to stabilize enrollment in the schools, Dancu said. He estimates that by 2020, the enrollment will be 5,358 students, an increase of 159 students from 2010-11.

"Things are going to continue to increase at a moderate level," he said. "There are no huge spikes."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.