ShareThis Page

North Huntingdon Township rec center fails to win support

| Thursday, July 21, 2011

Despite viewing a proposed recreation center as a community asset, North Huntingdon commissioners overwhelmingly oppose backing a municipal bond to help fund its construction.

None of the township board members expressed support on Wednesday night for an estimated $16 million to $18 million bond that would be necessary to build a rec center for the Norwin community.

Last month, representatives from the Norwin Area Community Center Commission asked elected officials in North Huntingdon, Irwin and North Irwin to indicate whether they'd participate in a bond issue.

Although township commissioners didn't formally vote last night, their comments left little doubt that North Huntingdon is unlikely to support a bond. Commissioners intend to vote on the issue at their Aug. 17 public meeting.

Several commissioners said they were concerned about the financial obligation that would fall upon the township if a rec center failed or North Huntingdon were the only sponsor of a bond.

Commissioner Tony Martino, one of the board's appointees to the commission, said he likes the potential project, but he's been adamant that it shouldn't lead to a tax increase.

"I'm still that way," he said. "I'm against that."

Another commission member, Commissioner Brian West, called it a "wonderful project," but suggested a private entity should consider pursuing it.

"I do not want to back that with any taxpayer dollars," he said.

Commissioner Rich Gray said he hasn't heard from any residents who want to commit tax dollars to the project.

The board briefly discussed whether the matter could be the subject of a referendum, but Solicitor Bruce Dice said it's unlikely unless it's specifically authorized by a statute.

Roy Lenhardt, the commission's interim coordinator, told the commissioners last month that the "project is a dead duck in the water" if North Huntingdon chooses not to back a bond.

A resident who serves on the commission, John Bales, declined to comment on the commissioners' discussion, saying he didn't want to speak for the panel.

Also last night, the board deadlocked 3-3 on a vote to accept $5,000 from the Westmoreland County District Attorney's Office to help pay for a new police K-9 officer.

The topic has been divisive, as some commissioners feel the county's donation and a $5,500 anonymous donation won't be enough to cover all of the costs associated with the dog.

Gray, Lee Moffatt and Zach Haigis voted against the donation, while Martino, West and Dave Herold voted for it. Commissioner Don Austin was absent.

However, the board unanimously agreed to award three contracts worth $338,950 for improvements to the Town House to comply with federal Americans with Disabilities Act guidelines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.