Expectant mothers using illegal drugs targeted in bill
Mothers who use illegal drugs while pregnant could be held for child abuse charges under a proposal being considered by state lawmakers.
Under a measure by state Sen. Pat Vance, R-Cumberland County, the definition of child abuse would be expanded to include cases in which a newborn tests positive for illegal drugs at birth. Mothers could then be included in the state's child abuse registry for life.
"This is early intervention at the very earliest possible time," said Vance, a registered nurse, at a Senate Aging and Youth Committee hearing Friday in Youngwood. She said her bill is intended to get the child help and protection, not to punish mothers. State Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield, chairs the committee.
About 10 percent of children in the United States are born to mothers who abuse drugs, and one in 13 children with a parent on drugs is physically abused regularly, according to statistics from the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association.
Francis Schultz, Crawford County district attorney and president of the state District Attorneys Association, said he'd like to see mothers who abused alcohol during pregnancy included in the measure and he'd like to see uniform testing standards required statewide.
"The mother's self-centered decision to use drugs while pregnant indisputably places the child's health and welfare at risk," said Jason Kutulakis, immediate past president of the Pennsylvania Children and Youth Solicitors Association. "While there may not be initial evidence of the effects the drug abuse had on the child, maternal drug use during pregnancy may have long-term effects on the child's cognitive and emotional behaviors."
But some human service providers contend that changing the definition of child abuse is unnecessary because state law already addresses newborns affected by prenatal drug use.
Marc Cherna, director of Allegheny County's Department of Human Services, said expanding the definition of child abuse won't make the problem go away. Instead, it will stigmatize mothers and create serious implications for her throughout her life. Employers in education, child care and health care are prohibited from hiring someone who is on the child abuse register.
Cherna said prenatal drug use cases fall under the state's "general protective service" category, many of which are opened for investigation. He said it's unnecessary to put these cases in a different category when either way "the goal remains the same -- to keep children safe and in their homes whenever possible."
Others believe changing the law would unfairly punish women by discouraging them from seeking treatment.
"Senate Bill 753 raises serious constitutional concerns because it punishes drug-dependent women who choose to carry their babies to term by labeling them as child abusers for the rest of their lives," said Andy Hoover, legislative director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. "(The bill) will deter drug-dependent pregnant women from obtaining prenatal care and delivering their babies in hospitals, thus leading to worse outcomes for infants."
Others who testified at the hearing, held at the Tots-n-Tikes Daycare & Preschool, said they favored a full-scale overhaul of the state's definition of child abuse.
Ward said after the hearing that she agrees and would favor a broader discussion of how the state defines child abuse. She plans to hold future hearings on the subject in Harrisburg.
Add Kari Andren to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Housing market remains ‘disaster’ in Westmoreland County
- Westmoreland judges’ caseloads unlikely to affect district boundary changes
- New Ohiopyle park manager ready for big challenge that comes with job
- Northampton man has four major drug arrests in Western Pa. since 2009
- ‘Extreme extrovert’ takes over at WCCC
- Mt. Pleasant seeks on-street bike trail through downtown
- Franklin Regional security guard fighting to get job back
- Pitt presents Web resource to combat OD deaths
- Western Pa. volunteers battle wildfires in West
- Restitution closes chapter for New Stanton mother
- St. Michael’s volunteers cook up festival delights