Share This Page

2 Greensburg sisters found passed out in running minivan

Two Greensburg sisters were passed out in a running minivan outside a convenience store, leaving a newborn unattended on the back seat, city police allege.

Jamie Lynn Dickant, 25, of 438 Foxhill St., faces a preliminary hearing on Nov. 17 on a charge of endangering the welfare of a child. Tonya Louise Dickant, 29, of 36 S. Lincoln Ave., who was behind the wheel of the van, faces a hearing the same day on a charge of driving under the influence of a controlled substance or metabolite.

The sisters were passed out about 2:45 p.m. on Oct. 21 outside the Sunoco convenience store on West Pittsburgh Street, police said. Tonya Dickant told police that she and her sister had taken a dose of methadone earlier that day, according to an affidavit.

The sisters didn't awaken, despite store patrons knocking on the windows of the 2001 Pontiac Montana, authorities said.

"This officer knocked on the window to wake the driver, but she did not stir," Officer Regina DePellegrin wrote in the affidavit.

DePellegrin opened the driver's door, turned off the vehicle and removed the keys from the ignition. She then woke the sisters.

Jamie Dickant immediately began to change her daughter's diaper, police said. There was an infant carrier in the van but no child seat, according to the affidavit.

Police didn't specify the baby's age.

Authorities contacted the Westmoreland County Children's Bureau, and another sister and a brother arrived. The brother carried the baby, bundled in blankets, home in the infant carrier. The third sister drove the van home.

Tonya Dickant submitted to a blood test to determine if narcotics were in her system, according to court papers.

The children's bureau was to follow up on the infant's care, police said.

The sisters will be sent notices about the charges this week by Greensburg District Judge James Albert's office.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.