ShareThis Page

Probing the per- diem scam

| Sunday, April 29, 2012, 2:50 p.m.

HARRISBURG

Former House Minority Whip Mike Veon, D-Beaver Falls, faces 59 criminal charges in the "Bonusgate" scandal for allegedly masterminding a multimillion-dollar political operation out of the state Capitol using tax dollars.

Five of the felonies against Veon issued by a statewide grand jury are raising eyebrows in some quarters.

They should also send a shiver of fear down the spines of other legislative leaders and committee chairmen.

The charges revolve around the so-called "basketball dinners."

Veon and his buds in the Democratic caucus would shoot hoops on Tuesday nights. Veon used his contingency account as a House leader to pay for meals that would be laid out on the conference table of his Capitol office by two female staffers.

Over a five-year period, Veon charged taxpayers $22,000 for meals, according to the grand jury. On the same dates meals were ordered, Veon also collected $10,865 from taxpayers in "per diem" payments. These are flat food and lodging expenses paid to lawmakers when they are on official business. No receipts are required.

Veon is charged with theft and conflict of interest for the dinners.

The per diem rate is now $158 for legislators for a Harrisburg trip.

Does that mean other House members and senators who used their contingency accounts for meals are guilty of crimes if they collected per diems on the same day?

By one analysis, House GOP chairmen and leaders spent $121,242 on dinners from 2005 through 2008. How many collected full per diems?

The fact that Veon's dinners came after B-ball games argues against their legitimacy.

However, since I've been covering the Capitol -- starting in 1983 -- lawmakers of both parties have been ripping off taxpayers by claiming the full per diem while also charging the state for pricey dinners. Sometimes, the caucus or chief clerk's office would provide dinner at the Capitol while legislators were in session.

The Maverick Steak House was the favorite watering hole for years until it burned down. Vissagio's, an Italian eatery, was also a regular spot. Tavern on the Hill has been a more recent favorite. There's no doubt whatsoever that many collected per diems while also charging the state for fancy dinners.

It's double-dipping.

Sometimes, leaders would put the arm on a lobbyist and take a half-dozen members along for a free meal, all the while collecting the full per diem.

In September, House Comptroller Alexis Brown issued a memo to all 203 House members saying in light of "recent events" lawmakers who go for dinner away from the Capitol must deduct that from their per diem. If the meals are provided at the Capitol by the clerk's office or during a caucus or committee meeting, they don't need to deduct dinners, she wrote.

The "other guy is doing it too" doesn't wash ethically. But you can be sure it will be raised by the defense.

Some suggest that going after Veon on the meals is selective prosecution by Attorney General Tom Corbett.

No way, his office says. He just followed the evidence.

"During the course of our investigation, we developed evidence related to Veon's basketball dinners," said Kevin Harley, spokesman for Corbett. "That evidence was referred to a grand jury. It will be up to a jury to determine whether that is misappropriating tax money. I can't really comment on the others. The evidence was uncovered in our investigation of Veon."

The long history of this double-dipping scam begs for a five-year forensic audit of the General Assembly.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.