ShareThis Page

Harold Ickes riseth again

| Sunday, Sept. 3, 2006


The midterm elections usually focus on the domestic economy. But this year the Bush administration believes that, as in the Connecticut primary, these elections will serve as a referendum on a number of international issues.

As each issue has a multiplicity of facets on which people of goodwill disagree, we face serious problems when those with malice toward some enter the discussion. In 2006, there certainly is an abundance of malice in the Democratic Party.

Two power centers divide the Democratic National Committee. One is headed by Howard Dean, who, since he captured the DNC from Terry McAuliffe in 2005, has done his best to eradicate -- or attempt to control -- the Clinton loyalists. Dean's quest for political power is based on his own ambition to occupy the White House, his dislike for the Clintons and their support for the Iraq war, his support from the hard left in the party and his self-believed ability to control the segment of the party that is against the war and for peace at any price.

If Dean, who has the power and support of the DNC, could raise money and campaign entirely through the Internet, at which he is no slouch, many believe he would attempt a palace revolution and run for the presidency.

The other power center, the Clintonistas through Hillary, believe they have an edge not only on her re-election to the Senate but on making her America's first female president. If that is to happen, she needs the support of two men.

The first is her husband, Bill, who last month joined the "grumpy old men" when he quietly celebrated his 60th birthday. The second is the brain of the Clinton duo, Harold Ickes, a New York City lawyer who now manages his firm's Washington office.

Scion of a political family whose father was Franklin Roosevelt's point man for the New Deal, Harold McEwan Ickes will be 67 on Monday. His credentials as a Freedom Rider and a New Left activist date back to the 1960s and have been enhanced by a reputation for ruthlessness and vengeance. He campaigned for Eugene McCarthy and met Bill Clinton in 1972, when they were both campaigning against the Vietnam War.

There was the usual Bill Clinton love-hate relationship with Ickes, who joined the White House in 1994 as a presidential assistant before becoming deputy chief of staff. He presided over or became very aware of many scandals involving the president and labor unions, fundraising and "diplomatic" offerings to China.

In 1996, Bill Clinton fired Ickes as a believed liability, which lasted two years until the Senate voted on the Clinton impeachment. On that day, Harold and Hillary met for four hours, after which Ickes became her unofficial campaign chief and, three years later, head of the Democrat Shadow Party.

Ickes co-founded the Democrat Shadow Party by launching core groups, such as America Coming Together, the Joint Victory Fund and The Media Fund in association with his friend George Soros.

But Harold Ickes is not campaigning for the presidency himself; there are others who may challenge Hillary. Perhaps chief among them is John Edwards, 53, who has a number of attributes that will endear him to Democrats, including a plan for universal health coverage.

Edwards works hard at campaigning, has a JFK-type of charisma and may be the Harold Ickes stalking horse.

And unless the Republicans can find stronger candidates than Mitt Romney and John McCain, we may find Harold Ickes as White House chief of staff.

Dateline D.C. is written by a Washington-based British journalist and political observer.

Additional Information:

Complete coverage

News | World
Politics | Storms
Iraq | Bird Flu
NFL Team-by-Team
NFL Game Stories

    Top election stories

    Top AP Stories

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.