The death tax
For as long as there have been politicians, politicians have hidden their true purposes by giving laws names that disguise what the laws actually do.
In the last Congress, for example, the so-called Freedom of Choice Act would have limited the right of workers to choose whether to join unions.
The estate tax is another such misnamed law. This tax should be called the "death tax," because that's the triggering mechanism: People are taxed after they die.
Just as a sales tax is paid when somebody sells you something and an income tax is triggered when you earn income, the death tax comes when you die. So rather than conjure visions of IRS grave-robbing, politicians named it the estate tax.
Interestingly, while the death tax directly affects thousands of families each year, it has an even greater impact on the living.
When Congress at the end of last year voted to keep the Bush-era tax rates in place through 2012, it made one huge exception: It voted to increase the death tax from zero to 35 percent for the next two years. This will apply to all estates valued at more than $5 million; beginning in 2013, the rate will increase again, to 55 percent on estates valued at more than $1 million.
Many estates, however, consist of business assets. And this looms large when business owners make plans.
If, because of the death tax, the Internal Revenue Service will claim more than a third of what you own after you die, you will act differently than you would if there were no estate tax. You might, for example, purchase life insurance to cover the cost of the tax. Or you might put your assets in a trust. Money that is spent this way is money that is not being used to grow your business.
In a research report I wrote recently for the American Family Business Foundation, I found that nearly 2,000 estate tax filings in 2009 included farm assets. If you consider that for every person over age 60 who dies there are another 19 people over 60 who remain alive, you can calculate that another 35,000 farms could have been hit with estate taxes if their owners had died.
In addition to farms, some 46 percent of all estate tax filings in 2009 listed other business assets, such as limited partnerships, closely held stock and unincorporated business assets. There probably is some overlap in these numbers, but we can estimate that some 29,000 private corporations and some 14,000 real estate partnerships also would be affected if their owners die.
These statistics paint a picture of small family business owners and family farmers being penalized by a tax that politicians claim is aimed at the idle rich. The fact is that the death tax can affect almost anyone, including the frugal middle class.
A worker who starts work at age 22, earns $30,000 the first year and receives average raises thereafter, saves 15 percent of his income in a 401(k), retires and dies at age 67 would pay the tax. Under current law, he would owe $50,000 or more.
The estate tax isn't a tax on trust fund babies and the idle rich. The idle rich can afford legions of tax accountants and lawyers to shelter their wealth from the estate tax. In fact, the estate tax is a tax on family-owned businesses, and it's killing thousands every year.
Antony Davies is an associate professor of economics at Duquesne University and a senior scholar at George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.