Share This Page

New campaign slogans

More than a few Pennsylvania Republicans -- and most Democrats -- have expressed vociferous opposition to a GOP legislative plan to go from the winner-take-all system of awarding the Keystone State's Electoral College votes to a proportional system, based on the winners of the commonwealth's respective congressional districts.

But guess what the national Republican Party has done• It has "quietly adopted a new rule" designed to extend the nominating process this presidential election cycle, reports The Associated Press. "The rule limits the ability of candidates to win large numbers of delegates in early primaries and caucuses -- those held before April -- because delegates must be awarded in proportion to the votes a candidate receives."

"A proportional system for me but not for thee" is not a very flattering campaign slogan. ...

Tim Murphy continually slathers makeup on his record (ahem) in an attempt to make the case that "Golly, gee, I really am a conservative Republican, Wally!" The "record," of course, says otherwise.

The Club for Growth ranked the 18th District congressman of Upper St. Clair as the fifth-most liberal Republican in the U.S. House (and, man, that's a BIG house) in 2010, reminds PoliticsPA. It also notes how the AFL-CIO ranks the Republicrat/Demolican as the fifth-most pro-labor GOPer in the country.

The website references are made in reporting that Mr. Murphy likely will face a primary challenge next year from Evan Feinberg, 26, a Peters Township native, who, until last week, had been on the Washington staff of Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

And for supposedly not being very concerned about Mr. Feinberg's prospective candidacy, a Murphy-orchestrated smear campaign appears to be already up and running. Spokeswoman Susan Mosychuk is trying to paint Feinberg as a carpetbagger. Never mind, as critics remind, that Murphy was born in Cleveland.

And PoliticsPA quotes some anonymous but quite obvious Murphy political strumpet belittling Feinberg's age and experience while discounting Murphy's vulnerability.

But vulnerable Murphy is. After all, it's why the party is expected to "gift" him with an even more Republican redistricted 18th to help political nature take its course.

Can't wait for Feinberg to target Murphy with a few clever campaign lines. An early favorite should be "In your heart you know he's not right."

Only in Pittsburgh would city "leaders" and their favored, taxpayer-subsidized developers cast aspersions on someone who has the audacity to offer to pay market value for real estate -- 10 times the favored rate to recidivist teat sucklers -- and the utter temerity to also propose spending up to $50 million to develop that real estate with no public subsidies. Here's a campaign motto: "North Shore development -- No Subsidy, No Service." ...

The Allegheny County Regional Asset District has increased its taxpayer subsidy to the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh by $362,000. Its new total from RAD will be $18.5 million. But the RAD board should have eliminated all taxpayer underwriting until the library opens every board meeting, not just one, to the public. It's the same reason city voters should, next month, reject a ballot measure to raise property taxes to help fund the system. "Up Yours!" sure is a funny fundraising campaign slogan.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.