Exposing the global warming racket
We've seen the ominous imagery a thousand times -- the smoke-belching power plants, huge cliffs of ice cascading into the sea and sad polar bears adrift on shriveling ice floes.
We've had the official Gospel of Catastrophic Global Climate Change preached at us so often by the mainstream media our pets have it memorized.
All together now: The planet is getting hotter. Glaciers are melting. Sea levels are rising. Fragile species are disappearing. Coral reefs are dying. Hurricanes are more powerful. Droughts are more prolonged. Floods and heavy rainstorms are more numerous.
According to Al Gore and a chorus of the planet's top climate scientists, blame for all of the above -- plus every bad, annoying or odd natural event that happens on Earth from now until the Sun implodes -- can be pinned with certainty on global warming caused by 200 years of mankind spewing excess CO2 into the air.
But is it really true that New York City will be two-stories deep in ocean water in a century or two?
No one knows. Despite what Professor Gore says, the science of climate change is still far too complex and uncertain for most scientists to understand the present, much less predict the distant future.
Most ordinary citizens -- i.e., the scientifically challenged -- are even more in the dark about what or whom to believe about global warming, thanks in large part to the mainstream media, which, with few exceptions, have become willing press agents for global warming alarmists.
But most people would stop their global worrying if they looked at the big picture and long run. For starters, we are at the tail end of an ice age that began about 40 million years ago. Ice sheets like the one that covered most of the Northern Hemisphere until about 20,000 years ago have come and gone in 40,000- and 100,000-year cycles.
Unless man-spewn greenhouse gases do raise Earth's temperature and keep it there permanently, or unless Mother Earth fixes her own wobbly axis or smooths out her eccentric orbit around the sun, we have a rendezvous with a future ice age no matter how many carbon taxes we implement or SUVs we drive.
Also, please stop worrying about the planet's 67,000-plus glaciers melting. Glaciers have retreated and advanced for eons. If every glacier not on Greenland or Antarctica disappeared in 1,000 years -- and no one is saying they will -- sea level would rise about 18 inches. By the way, about 90 percent of all of Earth's ice is in Antarctica -- and it's not shrinking.
As for those rising sea levels• It's not so scary if you know they've been rising for the last 18,000 years -- when they were about 400 feet lower -- thanks to the melting of millions of square miles of glaciers that existed during the last ice age.
In the past 100 years, according to global warming worrywarts, average sea levels have gone up about 174 millimeters -- 1.7 millimeters a year. That's .06 inches. Not too impressive when you know the Himalayas are still rising an average of nearly 5 millimeters each year and Australia is drifting toward the tropics at about 50 millimeters per year.
Of course, according to the global warming lobby, if we don't do something now to slow CO2 production, sea levels will surge and life is going to get hotter and harder for our grandchildren, who because of fossil-fuelish mankind will never get to hug a polar bear. But as we all know -- or should by now -- there are five times as many polar bears today as there were 50 years ago.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers QB Roethlisberger not targeting Oct. 25 return
- Rossi: Time for Pirates to take next step
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin not worried about Jones’ lack of sacks
- Penguins rally in wake of Dupuis injury
- New Florence assistant fire chief charged with having sex with juvenile
- How the Pirates put together another postseason contender
- Wolf still seeking to raise income tax, impose tax on shale-gas drilling
- Cubs’ Arrieta, Pirates’ Cole leave batters with little margin for error
- Same cast, improved results for Pitt defense
- Fans connect with their beloved Pirates through homemade signs
- Fleury’s demeanor helps keep Penguins loose, him playing his best