ShareThis Page

Who is the real Bob Casey?

| Friday, Sept. 8, 2006

If a political campaign is an extension of the candidate, then Senate candidate Bob Casey Jr. is alarmingly duplicitous or astonishingly oblivious about Team Casey soiling his good name. Controversies touching on sex, money, secret meetings, supporting the New World Order, hypocrisy -- and lots of it -- should cause Pennsylvanians to ask who is the real Bob Casey Jr.

Mr. Casey, the Pennsylvania treasurer, is the Democrats' nominee challenging Republican U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum. Carl Romanelli is the Green Party Senate candidate.

Opinion polls once suggested Casey had a double-digit lead over Mr. Santorum. But recent polls have Casey leading by only a few percentage points, less than two months before Election Day.

Given the stunning ineptitude of Team Casey, did Santorum close the gap or did Casey•

Sex advice columnist Dan Savage, an openly gay man who believes gay and lesbian couples should be allowed to marry, despises Santorum. So much so that Mr. Savage -- whose explicit carnal counseling would make Hugh Hefner blush -- donated $2,100 to the Casey campaign.

Wrote Savage: "The Casey campaign was grateful for my support. The day my check arrived ... I was personally invited to come meet Casey and get my picture taken with the candidate."

But then Jake Perry, Casey finance director, told Savage the money would be returned. Wink-wink.

Mr. Perry suggested other anti-Santorum groups that could use the money. "That way Casey could benefit from my money without having to, you know, associate himself with the likes of me," Savage wrote.

Shortly after a Trib editorial challenged Mr. Casey to be forthcoming about a $5,000 donation from the ultra-leftist Citizens for Global Solutions (CGS), Casey's campaign returned the money. Thank Cliff Kincaid, president of America's Survival Inc., for alerting the public to the donation.

Presumably returning the money was preferable to disclosing what Casey had promised the globalists in that private interview. Other candidates simply answered a questionnaire about their support for the new world order. Those answers are on the CGS Web site.

Said the CGS: "We have endorsed candidate Bob Casey to our members. His campaign chose to return our PAC contribution. We have nothing more to say on this subject. If you want more information, I suggest you contact Mr. Casey's campaign."

Contacting is easy. Getting a straight answer is anything but.

So what did Casey say?

"Bob tells people behind closed doors the same thing he says publicly," wrote Casey spokesman Larry Smar. And then Mr. Smar would not say what Casey told Citizens for Global Solutions behind closed doors to earn his $5,000.

Yet CGS still endorses Casey.

Smar even refused to confirm that a foreign political operative, Kenny Young, chairman of Scottish Labour Students, has been assisting the Casey campaign. Even though Mr. Young divulged his affiliation with the Scottish Labour Party when a nebby columnist asked why a Scotsman was answering Casey's phones.

"I really don't see how someone stuffing envelopes is of any interest to anyone. I'm not going to provide biographical information on our volunteers," Smar wrote.

Mr. Casey's beloved father ran as "the real Bob Casey" when elected governor of Pennsylvania in 1986.

But who is this Bob Casey?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.